The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children

Published:2006-07-01 Issue:1 Volume:118 Page:349-364
ISSN:0031-4005
Container-title:Pediatrics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Pawelski James G.¹,Perrin Ellen C.²,Foy Jane M.³,Allen Carole E.⁴,Crawford James E.⁵,Del Monte Mark⁶,Kaufman Miriam⁷,Klein Jonathan D.⁸,Smith Karen⁹,Springer Sarah¹⁰,Tanner J. Lane¹¹,Vickers Dennis L.¹²

Affiliation:

1. Divisions of State Government Affairs

2. Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics and Center for Children With Special Needs, Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

4. Pediatrics, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Center for Child Protection, Children's Hospital and Research Center, Oakland, California

6. Department of Federal Affairs, American Academy of Pediatrics, Washington, DC

7. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

9. Developmental Pediatrics and Preventive Services, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois

10. Pediatric Alliance, PC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

11. Children's Hospital and Research Center, Oakland, California

12. Pediatric Residency Program, John H. Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/118/1/349/1012023/zpe00706000349.pdf

Reference61 articles.

1. US Census Bureau. Selected characteristics from 1990 to supplement Census 2000 SF1—unmarried partner households. Available at: www2.census.gov/census_1990/other/90partners.txt. Accessed March 7, 2006

2. US Census Bureau. Married-couple and unmarried-partner households: 2000—Census 2000 special reports. Available at: www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2006

3. US Census Bureau, Population Division, Fertility & Family Statistics Branch. Technical note on same-sex unmarried partner data from the 1990 and 2000 censuses. Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/samesex.html. Accessed March 7, 2006

4. Badgett MVL, Rodgers MA. Left out of the Count: Missing Same-Sex Couples in Census 2000 Amherst, MA. Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies; 2003. Available at: www.iglss.org/media/files/c2k_leftout.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2006

5. Patterson CJ, Friel LV. Sexual orientation and fertility. In: Bentley G, Mascie-Taylor N, eds. Infertility in the Modern World Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2000

Cited by 78 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Familles homoparentales adoptives en Europe : défis parentaux et construction identitaire des enfants;La revue internationale de l'éducation familiale;2023-09-25

2. Family outcome disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual families: a systematic review and meta-analysis;BMJ Global Health;2023-02

3. The Legal Vulnerability Model for Same-Sex Parent Families: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Theoretical Integration;Frontiers in Psychology;2021-03-16

4. Using chi-squared automatic interaction detection modelling to identify student opinion profiles regarding same-sex couples as a family structure;Heliyon;2021-03

5. Harnessing Policies to Realize Diversity Performance;Beyond D&I;2021