Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices to Improve Pain Management of Neonates

Author:

Sharek Paul J.1,Powers Richard2,Koehn Amy3,Anand Kanwaljeet J. S.4

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California;

2. Department of Neonatology, Good Samaritan Hospital, San Jose, California;

3. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatal/Perinatal Medicine, Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana;

4. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Despite increased knowledge, improved options, and regulatory man-dates, pain management of neonates remains inadequate, promoted by the ineffective translation of research data into clinical practice. The Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative 2002 was created to provide participating NICUs the tools necessary to translate research, related to prevention and treat-ment of neonatal pain, into practice. The objective for this study was to use proven quality improvement methods to develop a process to improve neonatal pain management collaboratively. METHODS Twelve members of the Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative 2002 formed an exploratory group to improve neonatal pain management. The exploratory group established group and site-specific goals and outcome measures for this project. Group members crafted a list of potentially better practices on the basis of the available literature, encouraged implementation of the potentially better practices at individual sites, developed a database for sharing information, and measured baseline outcomes. RESULTS The goal “improve the assessment and management of infants experiencing pain in the NICU” was established. In addition, each site within the group identified local goals for improvement in neonatal pain management. Data from 7 categories of neonates (N = 277) were collected within 48 hours of NICU admission to establish baseline data for clinical practices. Ten potentially better practices were developed for prioritized pain conditions, and 61 potentially better practices were newly implemented at the 12 participating sites. Various methods were used for pain assessment at the participating centers. At baseline, heel sticks were used more frequently than peripheral intravenous insertions or venipunctures, with substantial variability in the number of avoidable procedures between centers. Pain was assessed in only 17% of procedures, and analgesic interventions were performed in 19% of the procedures at baseline. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative use of quality improvement methods resulted in the creation of self-directed, efficient, and effective processes to improve neonatal pain management. Group establishment of potentially better practices, collective and site-specific goals, and extensive baseline data resulted in accelerated implementation of clinical practices that would not likely occur outside a collaborative setting.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference77 articles.

1. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions;Barker;Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.,1995

2. A crosssectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units;Johnston;Clin J Pain.,1997

3. Epidemiology of pain in neonates;Porter;Res Clin Forums.,1998

4. operative and medical procedures. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research;Acute pain management in infants, children, and adolescents;Clin Pract Guide Quick Ref Guide Clin.,1992

5. Clinical importance of pain and stress in preterm newborn infants;Anand;Biol Neonate.,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3