Affiliation:
1. Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
2. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine
3. Department of Health Services, School of Public Health
4. Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Abstract
Background. The list of recommended pediatric preventive services has grown considerably in the past decade, and clinician variability, clinician distribution, and other correlates of provision of these basic preventive services (BPS) are not known.
Objective. To describe the proportion of high-quality basic pediatric preventive services, exclusive of immunizations, reported by parents and to identify sociodemographic and health system predictors and health service correlates of provision of these services.
Study Design. The study used cross-sectional data on 2041 children, 4 to 35 months of age, in the 2000 National Survey of Early Childhood Health.
Outcome Measures. The BPS measure assesses the receipt of (1) developmental assessment, (2) injury prevention counseling, (3) screening for parental smoking, (4) guidance on reading to the child, and (5) guidance on 14 other topics (assessed as a composite score). The BPS scale categorizes the receipt of services as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
Results. Most children received excellent (34.9%) or good (31.5%) care, but many received fair (24.9%) or poor (8.7%) care. Sociodemographic and health care factors such as race/ethnicity, insurance, and practice setting were not associated with BPS levels. Higher BPS scores were associated with parental reports of longer well-child visits, more counseling regarding family and community risk factors, lower rates of delayed or missed care, and greater satisfaction.
Conclusions. Two thirds of children receive good or excellent basic preventive care, as determined with this composite, and no disparities according to race/ethnicity, income, or health insurance status of families (which are often found to be associated with health care access) were found. This equitable distribution of high-quality care suggests a high level of clinician professionalism. Duration of visits may be a key factor to improve quality of care. Because of its association with other services, processes, and outcomes of care, the BPS scale may serve as a useful construct for monitoring quality and stimulating efforts to improve national pediatric preventive care.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference42 articles.
1. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998
2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Guidelines for Health Supervision III. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997 (updated 2002)
3. Green M, Palfrey J, eds. Bright Future: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 2000
4. Ettner SL. The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1748–1754
5. Byrd R, Hoekelman R, Auinger P. Adherence to AAP guidelines for well-child care under managed care. Pediatrics. 1999;104:536–540
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献