Affiliation:
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
2. Simulation Center
3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
4. Department of Pediatrics
5. Center for Clinical Effectiveness
6. Department of Surgery
7. Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. Most children present to community hospital emergency departments (EDs) for initial stabilization. Thus, all EDs must be prepared to care for injured children. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the quality of trauma stabilization efforts in EDs and (2) identify targets for educational interventions.
METHODS. This was a prospective observational study of simulated trauma stabilizations, that is, “mock codes,” at 35 North Carolina EDs. An evaluation tool was created to score each mock code on 44 stabilization tasks. Primary outcomes were (1) interrater reliability of tool, (2) overall performance by each ED, and (3) performance per stabilization task.
RESULTS. Evaluation-tool interrater reliability was excellent. The median number of stabilization tasks that needed improvement by the EDs was 25 (57%) of 44 tasks. Although problems were numerous and varied, many EDs need improvement in tasks uniquely important and/or complicated in pediatric resuscitations, including (1) estimating a child's weight (17 of 35 EDs [49%]), (2) preparing for intraosseous needle placement (24 of 35 [69%]), (3) ordering intravenous fluid boluses (31 of 35 [89%]), (4) applying warming measures (34 of 35 [97%]), and (5) ordering dextrose for hypoglycemia (34 of 35 [97%]).
CONCLUSIONS. This study used simulation to identify deficiencies in stabilization of children presenting to EDs, revealing that mistakes are ubiquitous. ED personnel were universally receptive to feedback. Future research should investigate whether interventions aimed at improving identified deficiencies can improve trauma stabilization performance and, ultimately, the outcomes of children who present to EDs.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference36 articles.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2003. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/tables/2003/03hus032.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2004
2. Ramenofsky ML, Morse TS. Standards of care for the critically injured pediatric patient. Trauma. 1982; 22: 921–933
3. Seidel JS, Hornbein M, Yoshiyama K, Kuznets D, Finkelstein JZ, St Geme JW. Emergency medical services and the pediatric patient: are the needs being met? Pediatrics. 1984; 73: 769–772
4. Cooper A, Barlow B, DiScala C, String D, Ray K, Mottley L. Efficacy of pediatric trauma care: results of a population based study. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28: 299–305
5. Nakayama D, Copes W, Sacco W. Differences in trauma care among pediatric and nonpediatric trauma centers. J Pediatr Surg. 1992; 27: 427–431
Cited by
88 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献