Appropriateness of Admissions and Days of Stay in Pediatric Wards of Italy

Author:

Bianco Aida1,Pileggi Claudia1,Trani Francesca1,Angelillo Italo F.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Medical School, University “Magna Græcia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy

Abstract

Objective. The objective of this study was to measure inappropriateness of admission and inpatient days in pediatric hospital wards in Catanzaro, Italy, and the effect of different variables on such inappropriateness. Design. A retrospective application was made using the Pediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol list of criteria. For each patient, there were recorded data on: sociodemographic characteristics; distance from home to hospital; date, day of the week, ward, and type of admission; overall and pre-index day length of hospital stay; and location within the stay of the day reviewed. Results. A total of 656 children were reviewed. Overall, 30% of the hospital admissions and 55.5% of days of stay were judged to be inappropriate; for about one third of those admitted inappropriately, the hospital stay was judged to be appropriate. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the inappropriate admission was significantly higher if the admission occurred during the daytime. The inappropriate number of days of hospitalization was significantly higher if the patient was female, if the admission was urgent, in medical wards, for patients who were inappropriately admitted, and for those sampled close to discharge. The main reasons for inappropriate use were hospital organization and an over-cautious physician in the management of a patient. Conclusions. The high degree of inappropriate admission or days of stay in pediatric wards and the reasons for such unnecessary hospital use suggest the need for a more vigilant interaction between hospital and community-based services to mitigate such inappropriateness and for a continuing education system to define standardized guidelines.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3