How open is this Platform? The Meaning and Measurement of Platform Openness from the Complementers’ Perspective

Author:

Benlian Alexander1,Hilkert Daniel2,Hess Thomas3

Affiliation:

1. Information Systems & E-Services, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany;

2. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Munich, Germany;

3. Institute for Information Systems & New Media, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Software platforms’ success largely depends on complementors’ willingness to repeatedly invest their time and effort to the development of platform applications that attract users and increase the platform's installed base. But how can platform providers encourage desirable behaviours by complementors (i.e., application developers) in the absence of formal roles and hierarchical control structures? Although previous studies of software-based platforms have identified openness as critical instrument at the macro (i.e., platform) level and have provided initial attempts to measure the construct, no research has been dedicated to comprehensively conceptualize and operationalize platform openness at the micro level from the perspective of application developers. To go beyond these preliminary findings and to theorize about the nature and effects of platform openness as perceived by application developers, we develop a construct called perceived platform openness (PPO). Drawing on recently advanced scale development methodologies, we conceptualize PPO as a multidimensional construct and empirically validate it with important consequent variables linked to developers’ continuous platform contributions. Empirical evidence from several rounds of qualitative and quantitative steps supports the conceptual validity of the construct and empirical relevance of the scale across different smartphone platform contexts (i.e., Apple iOS and Google Android). Researchers will benefit from the study's systematic and comprehensive conceptualization of PPO, how it is measured, and how it relates to critical application developer beliefs and attitudes. Platform managers may use our results to target the underlying facets of PPO most likely to contribute to the platform's long-term goals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Strategy and Management,Information Systems

Cited by 149 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rethinking Openness in Data Platforms: The Impact of Data Artifact Characteristics on Platform Openness;Business & Information Systems Engineering;2024-09-09

2. Digital platforms and the SDGs: A socio‐eco‐technical framework for SMEs based on cross‐case analysis;Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management;2024-08-21

3. Multi-Sectoral Collaboration and the Role of the Private Sector in Extending Healthy Life Expectancy: A Case of Frailty Prevention;2024 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET);2024-08-04

4. Q methodology and the sociotechnical perspective;Information Systems and e-Business Management;2024-06-09

5. Going all in or spreading your bet: a configurational perspective on open innovation interaction channels in production sectors;Production Engineering Archives;2024-05-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3