1. Alice Freifeld, Nationalism and the Crowd in Liberal Hungary, 1848–1914. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Baltimore, 2000, pp. 76–77.
2. László Teleki, May 14, 1849 as cited in György Szabad, “Lajos Kossuth’s Role in the Conceptualisation of a Danubian Federation,” in Ignács Romsics and Béla Király (eds.), Geopolitics in the Danube Regions: Hungarian Reconciliation Efforts, 1848–1998. Central European University Press, Budapest, 1999, p. 70. See also
3. Samuel J. Wilson, “Lost Opportunities: Lajos Kossuth, the Balkan Nationalities and the Danubian Confederation,” Hungarian Studies 8(2), 1993, 171–193.
4. Peter E Sugar, “The More it Changes, the More Hungarian Nationalism Remains the Same,” Austrian History Yearbook, 31, 2000, 135. On rival geopolitical plans for the region, see Ignác Romsics’ (occasionally overly schematic) “Plans and Projects for Integration in East Central Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries: Towards a Typology,” in Ignács Romsics and Béla Király (eds.), Geopolitics in the Danube Regions, pp. 1–17.
5. George Barany, “Hungary: The Uncompromising Compromise,” Austrian History Yearbook 3(1), 1967, 241; Alice Freifeld, Nationalism and the Crowd in Liberal Hungary, pp. 64–66, 78–81. For a brief overview of the Transylvanian issue from the Hungarian perspective, see