Abstract
AbstractThis paper is a manifesto for an infrastructural turn in psychoanalysis, proposing to look at institutions ‘slantwise’. It theorises psychoanalytic infrastructural thinking, pondering on its qualities as a particular kind of orientation to action, and showing its capacity to consider multiple transferences and ambivalence, as well as new fantasies on gain, accumulation and redistribution. It articulates the relationship between infrastructural thinking and a postural theory of the subject, centred on considering inclinations, orientations, and disorientations in relation to objects. Drawing on ethnographic and archival material, it constructs a ‘scene’ for observing infrastructural thinking at work, in psychoanalytic free clinics in Brazil, in the 1970s, and up to our times. It looks at the infrastructural creativities of the free clinics, which promise to renew the relationship of psychoanalysis with itself and with its others. Exploring the intersection of psychoanalysis and phenomenology, it traces the work of infrastructural thinking in postural moments, glitches, disorientations, or slips of the tongue.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
2. Ahmed, S. (2014). Mixed orientations. Subjectivity, 7, 92-109.
3. Anzieu, D. (1984). The group and the unconscious (B. Kilborne, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1975)
4. Balint, M. (1948). On the psycho-analytic training system. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 29, 163–173.
5. Berlant, L. (2022). On the inconvenience of other people. Duke University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献