Abstract
AbstractExploring the relationship between humans and AI chatbots, as well as the ethical concerns surrounding their use, this paper argues that our relations with chatbots are not solely based on their function as a source of knowledge, but, rather, on the desire for the subject not to know. It is argued that, outside of the very fears and anxieties that underscore our adoption of AI, the desire not to know reveals the potential to embrace the very loss AI avers. Consequently, rather than proposing a knowledge that seeks to disavow loss, we can instead recognize the potential in loss itself: an opportunity to assert and define the gap inherent to both the subject and AI we create.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Applied Psychology,Cultural Studies,Health (social science),Social Psychology
Reference34 articles.
1. Black, J. (2023). The psychosis of race: A Lacanian approach to racism and racialization. Routledge.
2. Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Duke University Press
3. Evans, D. (2006). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge.
4. Everitt, K. (2023, May 15). Does ChatGPT enjoy? The Philosophical Salon. https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/does-chatgpt-enjoy/
5. Felton, J. (2023, April 4). Researchers improve ChatGPT by getting it to learn from its own mistakes. IFL Science. https://www.iflscience.com/researchers-improve-chatgpt-by-getting-it-to-learn-from-its-own-mistakes-68299