Can students be encouraged to read? Experimental evidence from a large lecture

Author:

Breunig Christian,Klüser K. Jonathan,Yang Qixuan

Abstract

AbstractOne of the structural problems of introductory lectures is that students’ learning progress is primarily assessed by taking a final exam. Weekly preparation and reading are driven only by self-motivation. Can a student’s decision to complete her weekly assignments be influenced by a simple reminder? In a pre-registered experimental design, we test if personalised reminders from the instructor delivered via text messages contribute to learning outcomes. We assess formative learning via regular quizzes at the beginning of each class, and summative learning via grades in a final exam. We do not find statistically significant differences in learning outcomes, and discuss how design features potentially drive this result. In the conclusion, we stress the importance of experimental design in assessing innovative and new learning techniques.

Funder

Universität Zürich

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference31 articles.

1. Ambrose, S.A., ed. 2010. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. The Jossey-Bass higher and Adult Education Series, 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

2. Baier, K., Hendriks, C., Warren Gorden, K., et al. (2011) College Students’ Textbook Reading, or Not! American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook (31). American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook, available at http://www.americanreadingforum.org/yearbook/11_yearbook/documents/BAIER%20ET%20AL%20PAPER.pdf.

3. Barkley, E.F., and C.H. Major. 2020. Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.

4. Baron, N.S., and A. Mangen. 2021. Doing the reading: the decline of long long-form reading in higher education. Poetics Today 42 (2): 253–279.

5. Bloom, H.S. 2006. The core analytics of randomized experiments for social research. The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods 1: 115–133.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3