Abstract
AbstractCities play a critical role in delivering emission-free futures, yet the financial capacities, together with the unprecedented estimated capital requirements represent substantial barriers to climate action. In this study, we use data collected through the European Mission on 100 Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities to investigate how 362 ambitious, yet differently prepared cities are fostering climate investment, under three aspects of (i) financial readiness, (ii) financial proactiveness, and (iii) financial innovation. On one hand, according to their self-assessment, over 70% of the cities have not yet estimated—not even roughly—the total investment needed to become climate neutral and the majority (i) have experience in financing only a few specific climate projects, (ii) are ill-equipped to tap capital markets, (iii) have developed only marginally co-financing with the private sector, and (iv) have taken no steps to establish an investor-ready pipeline of projects contributing to climate neutrality. On the other hand, cities are at the forefront of financial innovation, creating blueprints and business models that are being tested under a learning-by-doing approach, creating deep and long-lasting transformative change, and establishing coordinating mechanisms with new critical players. In this context, current financial management, regulation, and institutional arrangements are key barriers to unlocking access to financing and creating an enabling environment for investment at the city level. The different levels of maturity in terms of financial readiness and institutional arrangements are discussed as the catalysers of climate financing at the city level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference59 articles.
1. Alkhani R (2020) Understanding private-sector engagement in sustainable urban development and delivering the climate agenda in Northwestern Europe—a case study of London and Copenhagen. Sustainability 12(Issue):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208431
2. Battiston S, Monasterolo I, Riahi K, van Ruijven BJ (2021) Accounting for finance is key for climate mitigation pathways. Science 372(6545):918–920. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf3877
3. Bertoldi P, Boza-Kiss B (2017) Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. Energy Policy 107:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.023
4. Bertoldi P, Boza-Kiss B, Della Valle N, Economidou M (2021) The role of one-stop shops in energy renovation—a comparative analysis of OSSs cases in Europe. Energy Build 250:111273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111273
5. Bertoldi P, Economidou M, Palermo V, Boza-Kiss B, Todeschi V (2021) How to finance energy renovation of residential buildings: Review of current and emerging financing instruments in the EU. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Energy Environ 10(1):e384
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献