Abstract
AbstractTransfer payments play a crucial role in combating poverty in countries. However, the effectiveness of transfer payments in alleviating poverty remains controversial due to variations in environmental factors, economic development, and cultural contexts across different nations. In this study, we employ counterfactual causal inference to examine the influence of government transfer payments on poverty. By utilizing data from China, we present new evidence that sheds light on related issues. Our findings reveal that transfer payments have a negative impact on the overall income of rural poor households. This can be attributed to a decrease in labor supply among rural poor residents who receive such payments, resulting in reduced wage income. Additionally, transfer payments lead to decreased expenditure on food and increased spending on healthcare. These changes in total income and consumption patterns indicate that China’s current transfer payment policy has short-term efficacy by meeting the basic living security needs of rural poor residents and improving their health conditions. However, the lack of significant changes in education spending suggests that transfer payments have little long-term effect.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference34 articles.
1. Ames B, Brown W, Devarajan S et al. (2001) Macroeconomic policy and poverty reduction. International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Washington, DC
2. Aryeetey GC, Westenen J, Spaan E (2016) Can health insurance protect against out-of-pocket and catastrophic expenditure and also support poverty reduction? Evidence from Ghana’s national health insurance scheme. Int J Equity Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0401-1
3. Banerjee AV, Hanna R, Kreindler GE et al. (2017) Debunking the stereotype of the lazy welfare recipient: evidence from cash transfer programs. World Bank Res Obs 32(2):155–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx002
4. Bastagli F, Hagen-Zanker L, Harman V et al. (2016) Cash transfers: what does the evidence say? A rigorous review of programme impact and of the role of design and implementation features. ODI, London
5. Berg MVD, Cuong NV (2011) Impact of public and private cash transfers on poverty and inequality: evidence from Vietnam. Dev Policy Rev 29(6):689–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00553.x
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献