Abstract
AbstractIt is often assumed that in developing countries there is a substantial link between the local governments and community participation. However, what is hardly ever highlighted is what happens when an authoritarian government uses decentralisation reforms to strengthen its power, interfering with not only public development but also the international community. On that account, this study argues that if an authoritarian regime focuses on using elaborate façades of representative institutions such as local government reforms rather than trusting the persuasive force of representative institutions, the local governments of a non-democratic centralised state will have similar authoritarian policies towards civic engagement. The study was based on fieldwork research and the data obtained from the responses to seventy qualitative questionnaires with seven open-ended questions in two districts of Sindh. The findings suggest that the various local governments of Pakistan acted as a medium of recentralisation and created alienation instead of bringing the marginalised communities closer to local power. This article shows that if local governments are used by an authoritarian regime with the purpose of misleading the international community and stifling development, such a system will create alienation between the state and the ordinary citizens.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference72 articles.
1. Abbasi S (2006) Devolution or de-evolution? A critical study of the devolution plan 2000. National Book Foundation
2. Agrawal A (1999) Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. J Dev Areas 33(4):473–502
3. Ali A (2020) An investigation into the role of local government in enhancing the public participation in Sindh, Pakistan: policy and practice in service delivery. PhD thesis, University of Bradford
4. Ali A (2022) Fragile states, decentralisation and the nature of barriers to citizen participation in local government: a view from Pakistan. Soc Sci 2(2):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00308-1
5. Andrews R, Cowell R, Downe J, Martin S, Turner D (2008) Supporting effective citizenship in local government: engaging, educating and empowering local citizens. Local Gov Stud 34(4):489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930802217462