Abstract
AbstractSociological general theories (or “grand theories”) have been criticized for being too abstract to be of any practical use for empirical sociological work. This paper presents the outline of a general theory that claims to be better linked to empirical social research than previous theoretical attempts. The theory analyzes social life as a multitude of interacting social games. A social game is an entity created by players with resources who engage in action that is shaped by goals, rules, and representations, that involves objects, and that leads to game outcomes. The general theory is as encompassing as previous theoretical attempts, while allowing us to integrate both instrumental and normative action at different levels of the social. Its main advantage is that it is linked to middle-range theory and empirical research by a descriptive-interpretive heuristic, an explanatory heuristic, and formal and agent-based modeling. The article provides many examples to illustrate the claims.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference82 articles.
1. Alexander J (1986) Theoretical logic in sociology. Vol. 4. The modern reconstruction of classical thought: Talcott Parsons. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles
2. Bateson P (2005) The role of play in the evolution of great apes and humans. In: Pellegrini AD, Smith PK (eds) The nature of play. Great apes and humans. The Guildford Press, New York, pp. 13–24
3. Van den Berg A (1998) Is sociological theory too grand for social mechanisms? In: Hedström P, Swedberg R (eds) Social mechanisms. An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 204–237
4. Boudon R (1976) Comment on Hauser’s review of education, opportunity, and social inequality. Am J Sociol 81(5):1175–1187. https://doi.org/10.1086/226196
5. Boudon R (1982) The unintended consequences of social action. St. Martin’s Press, New York