Abstract
AbstractUniversal healthcare systems have undergone a severe stress test in the form of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With respect to the system-embedded allocation of decision-making powers and responsibilities among actors, different modalities have been revealed in the COVID-19 responses of South Korea and the UK, respectively. This article compares and analyzes how these two countries’ healthcare systems have reacted to COVID-19. Although both have implemented similar responsive measures, the UK has recorded a higher number of confirmed cases per thousand people and a higher death rate. Based on the analysis on which this paper is built, the key differences between the two systems are the UK system’s lack of: (1) appropriate medical equipment and technologies along with the human resources; and (2) flexible policy options to incentivize healthcare providers and induce cooperation from the public in a time of national crisis. The UK’s healthcare system is now approaching a critical juncture. The expansion of internal competition, which was introduced to the system in 1991, can serve as means of initiating a resolution to the above-mentioned issues and further reform its system. Under the UK government’s close supervision and precise control, allowing non-reimbursable special medical treatment in the system and widening public choice of medical services would be a suitable policy approach promoting internal competition while at the same time maintaining the UK’s devotion to universal healthcare. The underlying implication of internal competition though is the sharing of decision-making powers and responsibilities with societal and private sectors by inducing and facilitating participation at all levels. Fighting against COVID-19 however is widely considered ‘all-out-war.’ Under the UK government’s supervision and control, it is time for society to step up and fight the pandemic together.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. AlKetbi R, AlNuaimi D, AlMulla M, AlTalai N, Samir M, Kumar N, AlBastaki U (2020) Acute myelitis as a neurological complication of Covid-19: a case report and MRI findings. Radiol Case Rep 15(9):1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.06.001
2. Alom S, Haiduc AA, Melamed N, Axiaq A, Harky A (2020) Use of ECMO in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: does the evidence suffice? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 30]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020:S1053-0770(20)30743-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.070
3. Aragão MDFVV, Leal MC, Cartaxo FOQ, Fonseca TM, Valença MM (2020) Anosmia in COVID-19 associated with injury to the olfactory bulbs evident on MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41(9):1703–1706. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6675
4. Ashworth J (2020) Labour calls for plan to clear NHS backlog as new analysis shows Covid-19 response causing huge delays for vital scans and diagnostic tests. The Labour Party. https://labour.org.uk/press/labour-calls-for-plan-to-clear-nhs-backlog-as-new-analysis-shows-covid-19-response-causing-huge-delays-for-vital-scans-and-diagnostic-tests/. Accessed 18 Nov. 2020
5. Battilana J (2011) The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status Quo: evidence from the UK National Health Service. Organ Sci 22(4):817–834. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0574
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献