Abstract
AbstractThis study used semi-structured interviews with twenty-four external auditors to explore how they perceive and use fraud factors when assessing fraudulent financial reporting risk in external audits. The fraud factors include top management’s motive, integrity, opportunity, rationalisation, and capabilities. The participants work for Big four audit firms and have international auditing experience, specifically in the US, the UK, Egypt, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia. The findings reveal that top management’s integrity and motives are, in theory, the most critical factors in fraud risk assessment. However, a self-selection bias pushes external auditors not to evaluate these essential factors because they are too complicated to assess, and not enough guidance is provided to them by standard setters or audit firms. In turn, external auditors concentrate mainly on evaluating the opportunities to commit fraud when assessing fraud risk. This may lead to non-optimal fraud risk assessment and, ultimately, non-optimal audit quality. The findings have implications for policy, practice, and future research, later discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Strategy and Management,Safety Research
Reference61 articles.
1. ACFE., 2022 Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Available at: www.acfe.com
2. Albrecht, W.S., K.R. Howe, and M.B. Romney. 1984. Deterring fraud: The internal auditor’s perspective. Altamonte Springs: Institute of Internal External Auditors Research Foundation.
3. Albrecht, W.S., C. Albrecht, and C.C. Albrecht. 2008. Current trends in fraud and its detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective 17 (1): 2–12.
4. Albrecht, S., 2014, Iconic fraud triangle endures. Fraud Magazine. Available at https://www.fraud-magazine.com/article.aspx?id=4294983342
5. Al-Dhubaibi, A.A.S., and H.H.H. Sharaf-Addin. 2022. An analysis of external and internal auditors’ use of ISA 240 red flags: The impact of auditors’ estimation of fraud pervasiveness. Cogent Business & Management 9 (1): 2118209.