Blood pressure during endovascular treatment under conscious sedation or local anesthesia

Author:

Samuels NoorORCID,van de Graaf Rob A.ORCID,van den Berg Carlijn A.L.,Nieboer Daan,Eralp Ismail,Treurniet Kilian M.,Emmer Bart J.,Immink Rogier V.,Majoie Charles B.L.M.ORCID,van Zwam Wim H.,Bokkers Reinoud P.H.,Uyttenboogaart Maarten,van Hasselt Boudewijn A.A.M.,Mühling Jörg,Burke James F.,Roozenbeek Bob,van der Lugt Aad,Dippel Diederik W.J.ORCID,Lingsma Hester F.,van Es Adriaan C.G.M.,

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of blood pressure as mediator of the effect of conscious sedation (CS) compared to local anesthesia (LA) on functional outcome after EVT.MethodsPatients treated in MR CLEAN Registry centers with CS or LA as preferred anesthetic approach during EVT for ischemic stroke were analyzed. First, we evaluated the effect of CS on area under the threshold (AUT), relative difference between baseline and lowest procedural mean arterial pressure (∆LMAP) and procedural blood pressure trend, compared to LA. Second, we assessed the association between blood pressure and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) with multivariable regression. Lastly, we evaluated whether blood pressure explained the effect of CS on mRS.ResultsIn 440 patients with available blood pressure data, patients treated under CS (n = 262) had larger AUTs (median 228 vs 23 mm Hg*min), larger ∆LMAP (median 16% vs 6%) and a more negative blood pressure trend (−0.22 vs −0.08 mm Hg/min) compared to LA (n = 178). Larger ∆LMAP and AUTs were associated with worse mRS (adjusted common OR (acOR) per 10%-drop 0.87, 95%CI 0.78–0.97, and acOR per 300 mm Hg*min 0.89, 95%CI 0.82–0.97). Patients treated under CS had worse mRS compared to LA (acOR 0.59, 95%CI 0.40–0.87) and this association remained when adjusting for ∆LMAP and AUT (acOR 0.62, 95%CI0.42–0.92).ConclusionsLarge blood pressure drops are associated with worse functional outcome. However, blood pressure drops do not explain the worse outcomes in the CS group.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3