Predicting Outcome in Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Author:

Doets Alex Y.,Lingsma Hester F.,Walgaard Christa,Islam Badrul,Papri Nowshin,Davidson Amy,Yamagishi YukoORCID,Kusunoki Susumu,Dimachkie Mazen M.ORCID,Waheed Waqar,Kolb Noah,Islam Zhahirul,Mohammad Quazi Deen,Harbo Thomas,Sindrup Soren H.,Chavada Govindsinh,Willison Hugh J.,Casasnovas Carlos,Bateman KathleenORCID,Miller James A.L.ORCID,van den Berg Bianca,Verboon Christine,Roodbol Joyce,Leonhard Sonja E.,Benedetti Luana,Kuwabara Satoshi,Van den Bergh Peter,Monges Soledad,Marfia Girolama A.,Shahrizaila Nortina,Galassi Giuliana,Péréon Yann,Bürmann Jan,Kuitwaard Krista,Kleyweg Ruud P.,Marchesoni Cintia,Sedano Tous María J.,Querol LuisORCID,Illa Isabel,Wang Yuzhong,Nobile-Orazio Eduardo,Rinaldi SimonORCID,Schenone AngeloORCID,Pardo Julio,Vermeij Frederique H.,Lehmann Helmar C.,Granit VolkanORCID,Cavaletti GuidoORCID,Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez GerardoORCID,Barroso Fabio A.,Visser Leo H.,Katzberg Hans D.,Dardiotis EfthimiosORCID,Attarian ShahramORCID,van der Kooi Anneke J.,Eftimov Filip,Wirtz Paul W.,Samijn Johnny P.A.,Gilhuis H. Jacobus,Hadden Robert D.M.ORCID,Holt James K.L.,Sheikh Kazim A.,Karafiath Summer,Vytopil Michal,Antonini Giovanni,Feasby Thomas E.,Faber Catharina G.,Gijsbers Cees J.,Busby Mark,Roberts Rhys C.ORCID,Silvestri Nicholas J.,Fazio Raffaella,van Dijk Gert W.,Garssen Marcel P.J.,Straathof Chiara S.M.,Gorson Kenneth C.,Jacobs Bart C.,

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesThe clinical course and outcome of the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) are diverse and vary among regions. The modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (mEGOS), developed with data from Dutch patients, is a clinical model that predicts the risk of walking inability in patients with GBS. The study objective was to validate the mEGOS in the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) cohort and to improve its performance and region specificity.MethodsWe used prospective data from the first 1,500 patients included in IGOS, aged ≥6 years and unable to walk independently. We evaluated whether the mEGOS at entry and week 1 could predict the inability to walk unaided at 4 and 26 weeks in the full cohort and in regional subgroups, using 2 measures for model performance: (1) discrimination: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and (2) calibration: observed vs predicted probability of being unable to walk independently. To improve the model predictions, we recalibrated the model containing the overall mEGOS score, without changing the individual predictive factors. Finally, we assessed the predictive ability of the individual factors.ResultsFor validation of mEGOS at entry, 809 patients were eligible (Europe/North America [n = 677], Asia [n = 76], other [n = 56]), and 671 for validation of mEGOS at week 1 (Europe/North America [n = 563], Asia [n = 65], other [n = 43]). AUC values were >0.7 in all regional subgroups. In the Europe/North America subgroup, observed outcomes were worse than predicted; in Asia, observed outcomes were better than predicted. Recalibration improved model accuracy and enabled the development of a region-specific version for Europe/North America (mEGOS-Eu/NA). Similar to the original mEGOS, severe limb weakness and higher age were the predominant predictors of poor outcome in the IGOS cohort.DiscussionmEGOS is a validated tool to predict the inability to walk unaided at 4 and 26 weeks in patients with GBS, also in countries outside the Netherlands. We developed a region-specific version of mEGOS for patients from Europe/North America.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that the mEGOS accurately predicts the inability to walk unaided at 4 and 26 weeks in patients with GBS.Trial Registration InformationNCT01582763.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3