Abstract
Recognition of the U.S. pellagra ``epidemic'' in the early part of this century occurred in stages. The recognition process distorted impressions of magnitude, rate of spread, and virulence. Unrecognized cases: Endemic pellagra developed from dietary deficiencies after the Civil War. Initially, cases were misdiagnosed as other more traditional disorders. Tradition and authority inhibited recognition. Recognition of severe cases: Beginning in 1907, outbreaks were reported in asylums. Existing severe cases came rapidly to medical attention, inflating the apparent rate of spread. Recognized cases had a fulminant course and a high case fatality. Expanded spectrum: Milder cases were increasingly recognized, leading to an exaggerated rate of increase in number of cases and a decrease in case fatality and apparent virulence. Greater sensitivity resulted largely from a shift in diagnostic thresholds, with loss of specificity and increase in false positive diagnoses. Standardization of diagnosis: Although no suitable diagnostic marker test was developed, diagnosis was ultimately standardized by development of a workable case definition and by assessment of response to an effective therapy (nicotinic acid) applied to presumptive cases.NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 829-834
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference46 articles.
1. Roe DA. A plague of corn: the social history of pellagra. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1973.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The history of pellagra;Dermatology Review;2021
2. Nutritional Physiology;Innovations in Food Technology;2020
3. Niacin;Present Knowledge in Nutrition;2020
4. Aetiological doctrines and prevalence of pellagra: 18th century to middle 20th century;South African Journal of Science;2018-09-11
5. Enrichment and Fortification;Food Policy;2015-08-12