Learning styles preferences among graduate and undergraduate pharmacy students in Pakistan: Does it matter?

Author:

Malik Madeeha1ORCID,Ahmad Mahjabeen1,Hussain Azhar1

Affiliation:

1. Hamdard University Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of student learning depends on the approaches that are used for learning. An association exists between different learning methodologies and learning outcomes. Objective: The present study was designed to assess preferences for different learning styles among pharmacy students in Islamabad, Pakistan. Method: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. A self-administered pre-validated questionnaire VARK version 8.0 was distributed to 387 undergraduate students from both public and private pharmacy schools located in Islamabad and 100 graduate students selected from public sector pharmacy schools using the convenience sampling technique. After data collection, it was cleaned, coded, and analysed using SPSS version 21. Results: The results of the present study showed that the most common learning style among graduate students was Aural (Total Score = 492), followed by kinesthetic (Total Score = 467), read/write (Total Score = 351), and visual (Total Score = 290). On the other hand, the most common learning style among undergraduate students was Aural (Total score = 1926), followed by kinesthetic (Total score = 1859), read/write (Total score = 1241), and visual (Total score = 1166). Conclusion: The result of the present study concluded aural as the most preferred learning style followed by kinesthetic among both undergraduate and graduate pharmacy students. Graduate female pharmacy students showed more preference towards kinesthetic learning style as compared to graduate male students who showed more preference towards aural learning modality. However, both undergraduate and graduate male and female students preferred aural learning style. Identifying the learning style at the start of pharmacy degree can help mentors to assess the appropriate field for them after graduation. Moreover, information regarding such styles would be helpful for stakeholders to devise effective strategies for teaching and introduce changes accordingly into the curriculum.

Publisher

International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy,Education

Reference17 articles.

1. Adams, M.E., Bell, L.A. E., & Griffin, P.E. (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group

2. Ahil M.S., Sarojini R, & R., P. (2016). A cross-sectional observational study on the attitude of medical students about the existing curricular patterns in medical education. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(8), 1481-1483

3. Ahmady, S., Khajeali, N., Sharifi, F., & Mirmoghtadaei, Z. S. (2019). Factors related to academic failure in preclinical medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 7(2), 74

4. Al‐Saud, L. M. S. (2013). Learning Style Preferences of First–Year Dental Students at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Influence of Gender and GPA. Journal of dental education, 77(10), 1371-1378

5. Bhalli, M. A., Khan, I. A., & Sattar, A. (2016). Learning style of medical students and its correlation with preferred teaching methodologies and academic achievement. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 27(4), 837-842

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3