Affiliation:
1. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Abstract
Background Ligamentous lesions of the ankle joint are common. Isolated medial ligament injuries are rare but are often associated with lateral ligament injuries, isolated medial ligament lesions are often overlooked. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional differences in the outcomes of isolated lateral and combined medial and lateral ligament reconstruction. The study is based on patient-reported outcome measurements and motion sensor technology to assess these outcomes. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of isolated lateral and combined lateral and medial ankle ligament reconstruction. Methods From December 2014 to August 2018, 111 patients underwent either isolated lateral ligament (LG) or medial and lateral ligament (MLG) reconstruction. Of the 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 49 had LG and 55 had MLG reconstruction. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 Health Survey SF-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAMG), Tegner Activity Scale, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ancle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and the Karlsson Peterson Score. Mobility and stability were assessed using the Ortheligent™ motion sensor for both healthy and treated ankles. Results While there were no significant differences in outcome scores between the groups, overall scores improved after treatment (p >0.00). Notably LG showed improved movement, with better dorsal extension measured by the Sensor (p ÷ 0.02). The sensor’s results correlated significantly with FAOS subscales for pain (p ÷0.05), stiffness (p ÷ 0.01), ADL (p ÷0.02), and sports (p >0.00). Conclusion Postoperative results, regardless of LG or MLG, showed significant subjective well-being improvement. LG’s advantages were highlighted by a significant improvement in dorsal extension, supported by correlated results from a portable motion sensor assessing ankle stability.
Reference53 articles.
1. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies;C. Doherty;Sports Med,2014
2. Sprained ankles. 3. Clinical observations in recent ligament ruptures;L. Broström;Acta Chir Scand,1965
3. Sprained ankles. VI. Surgical treatment of “chronic” ligament ruptures;L. Broström;Acta Chir Scand,1966
4. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains;J. G. Garrick;Med Sci Sports,1973
5. Anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle with a gracilis autograft: A new technique using an interference fit anchoring system;M. Takao;American Journal of Sports Medicine,2005