Comparative Analysis of Educational Approaches: Unveiling Strengths across Attributes

Author:

Abstract

Design plays a pivotal role in the successful development of any interactive learning environment (ILE). Furthermore, in the realm of technology-enhanced learning (TEL), the design process necessitates contributions from a wide array of expertise areas. Therefore, individuals engaged in tool development must directly confront the design challenge from multiple standpoints. This article aims to present a comprehensive analysis of current research that centers on the utilization of various approaches as a means of enhancing technology-driven learning environments. The objective is to investigate how much of its instructional promise is genuinely put into practical implementation. The review exclusively considers empirical studies that have been published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, focusing specifically on the application of diverse approaches as educational environments. Over the past ten years, the methodology of design-based research has proven its potential in both the research and design aspects of technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs). This article delineates and characterizes design-based research, outlining its significance in the development of technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs). It also introduces principles for the integration of design-based research into TELEs, and deliberates on the forthcoming challenges associated with this approach. The introduction of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) techniques has transformed the allocation of the most crucial resource in the education system: the time of educators and learners. Although new technology holds the promise of increased personalization and efficiency, the impact on staff time must be meticulously analyzed. Without careful consideration, TEL methods might escalate expenses without proportionate advantages. The paper evaluates various methods of comparing teaching time costs between TEL and traditional approaches. The conclusion suggests that cost-benefit modeling conducted within the institution provides the most accurate means of comprehending how educators can leverage technology to attain the level of efficiency that renders personalization economically viable. Options explored include Interactive Online Courses, Virtual Reality Classrooms, Gamified Learning Platforms, Personalized Learning AI, and Collaborative Social Learning. Assessment criteria encompass Learning Effectiveness, Engagement, Adaptability, Skill Transfer, Cost, Accessibility, User Experience, and Data Privacy. The examination serves as a foundation for establishing prerequisites tailored to a forward-looking cost-benefit framework. The process commences with strategic decisions aimed at realizing the advantages of Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL). These decisions, in turn, inform the identification of probable essential expenditures, thus delineating the inherent "benefits-oriented cost model." A key benefit of this approach is that it empowers innovators to strategically plan and comprehend the dynamic between anticipated educational gains and potential teaching expenses.

Publisher

REST Publisher

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3