Abstract
This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of limited fluid resuscitation on traumatic hemorrhagic shock combined with traumatic coagulopathy. A cohort of 120 patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock complicated with traumatic coagulopathy at admission were divided into two groups based on their emergency fluid resuscitation: the study group (received restrictive fluid resuscitation) and the control group (received conventional fluid resuscitation). Then, the incidence of complications, coagulation parameters, blood gas parameters and electrolyte parameters between the two groups were compared. The incidence of complications in the study group was 6.67%, which was significantly lower than the 20.00% observed in the control group (p < 0.05). Before resuscitation, there was no significant difference in coagulation parameters, blood gas parameters and electrolyte parameters between the two groups (p > 0.05), and in both groups, before and after resuscitation, the coagulation parameters after resuscitation were higher than those before resuscitation, blood gas parameters were lower than those before resuscitation, Mg2+, Cl− and Na+ levels were higher than those before resuscitation, K+ was lower than that before resuscitation, and the difference had statistical significance (p < 0.05). After resuscitation, the coagulation parameters in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group, the BL (Blood Lactic Acid) and PaCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood) levels in the study group were lower than those in the control group, the BE (base excess) and PaO2 levels were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, after resuscitation, we found no significant difference in electrolyte parameters between both groups (p > 0.05). Restrictive fluid resuscitation was found to significantly enhance coagulation and blood gas function, stabilize water and electrolyte balance and reduce complications in traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients complicated with traumatic coagulopathy. These findings hold substantial clinical significance and merit further exploration.