The Relationship Between Achilles Tendon Thickness and Instent Restenosis in Patients with Carotid Stents

Author:

Yılmaz Cemalettin1ORCID,Güvendi Şengör Büşra2ORCID,Özdil Mehmet Hasan3ORCID,Kaya Ahmet Ferhat3ORCID,Öcal Lütfi2ORCID,Havan Nuri4ORCID,Karagoz Ali2ORCID,Yazıcıoğlu Mehmet Vefik2ORCID,Zehir Regayip2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sağlık bilimleri üniversitesi Kartal koşuyolu yüksek ihtisas eğitim ve araştırma hastanesi

2. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KARTAL KOŞUYOLU YÜKSEK İHTİSAS SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ

3. Muş Devlet Hastanesi

4. DEMIROGLU SCIENCE UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Objective: Considering that atherosclerosis and Achilles tendon thickening share common mechanisms, the aim of this study to reveal the relationship between Achilles tendon thickness (ATT) and carotid in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: In this study, 89 patients who had carotid stenting for carotid artery disease at our institute between 2016 and 2020 were included. Subjects were divided into two groups as restenosis (+) and restenosis (-) based on the ultrasonographic and/or angiographic findings. The development of 50% or more restenosis in the carotid stent was defined as ISR. Bilateral ATT was measured for all patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Results: In our study, 16 (17.9%) patients constituted the restenosis group and 73 (82%) the no-restenosis group. ATT values were similar between groups (4.90.8 vs 4.70.6, p=.27). However, in the marginal effect graphic, it has been demonstrated that the probability of carotid stent restenosis increases with the increase in the mean ATT. The probability of restenosis was 14% when the mean ATT value was 4.16 mm (mean -1 SD) and the probability of restenosis was 22% when the mean ATT value was 5.36 mm (mean +1 SD). Conclusion: No significant difference was found in ATT between the restenosis and no-restenosis group, however, the probability of restenosis increased with increasing ATT. In addition, ultrasonographic measurement of ATT is an easy, inexpensive and safe method that can be used to identify patients at high risk for carotid stent restenosis.

Funder

yok

Publisher

Marmara University

Reference27 articles.

1. Brott TG, Howard G, Roubin GS, Meschia JF, Mackey A, Brooks W, Moore WS, Hill MD, Mantese VA, Clark WM, Timaran CH, Heck D, Leimgruber PP, Sheffet AJ, Howard VJ, Chaturvedi S, Lal BK, Voeks JH, Hobson RW, CREST Investigators. Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(11):1021-1031. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215

2. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, Ederle J, van der Worp HB, de Borst GJ, Mali WPTM, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Engelter ST, Lyrer PA, Ford GA, Dorman PJ, Brown MM, International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: The International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. Lancet 2015;385(9967):529-538. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3

3. Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, Berger J, Fraedrich G, Hacke W, Hennerici M, Stingele R, Fiehler J, Zeumer H, Jansen O. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: A multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):893-902. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70196-0

4. Barros P, Felgueiras H, Pinheiro D, Guerra M, Gama V, Veloso M. Restenosis after carotid artery stenting using a specific designed ultrasonographic protocol. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2014;23(6):1416-1420. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.002

5. Tekieli Ł, Musiałek P, Kabłak-Ziembicka A, Trystuła M, Przewłocki T, Legutko J, Dzierwa K, MacIejewski D, Michalski M, Pieniązek P. Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS). Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(4):465. DOI: 10.5114/AIC.2019.90221

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3