Affiliation:
1. Penza State University, Medical Institute
2. Penza Regional Clinical Hospital N. N. Burdenko
Abstract
Background. In modern cardiology, 24-hour electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring has a high diagnostic value, but this method has a number of disadvantages in detecting episodes of unstable life-threatening arrhythmias. An increase in ECG monitoring duration allows expanding the possibilities of diagnosing life-threatening arrhythmias.Objective. To study the possibilities of long-term ECG monitoring (48–120 hours) in the detection of life-threatening arrhythmic events and parameters of myocardial electrical instability in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Design and methods. The study included 71 STEMI patients. All patients from the 4th day of STEMI underwent multi-day ECG monitoring in 3 leads using a telemetric ECG recording complex with an average recording duration of 90.4 ± 30.2 hours. The analysis of episodes of myocardial ischemia, rhythm and conduction disturbances, turbulence and heart rate variability, late ventricular potentials and dispersion of the QT interval within 5 days was carried out.Results. Long-term monitoring allowed detecting high-grade ventricular extrasystoles. Analysis of episodes of myocardial ischemia in the postinfarction period revealed significant differences in the data of 120h-ECG monitoring in comparison with 24h-ECG. Multiday ECG monitoring made it possible to detect dysfunction of the autonomic regulation of cardiac activity in patients 2 times more often.Conclusion. A comprehensive assessment of the possibilities of multi-day ECG monitoring is a promising direction in predicting severe arrhythmias in patients in the postinfarction period.
Publisher
Arterialnaya Gipertenziya
Reference19 articles.
1. Averyanov AV, Adrianov AV, Ardashev AV, et al. Sudden cardiac death. ed. by Shlyakhto EV, et al. Moscow: Medpraktika-M, 2015, p. 704. In Russian.
2. Koltowski L, Balsam P, Glowczynska R, et al. Kardia Mobile applicability in clinical practice: A comparison of Kardia Mobile and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram records in 100 consecutive patients of a tertiary cardiovascular care center. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(4):543–548. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0001.
3. Varma N, Cygankiewicz I, Turakhia M, et al. 2021 ISHNE/ HRS/ EHRA/ APHRS collaborative statement on mHealth in Arrhythmia Management: Digital Medical Tools for Heart Rhythm Professionals: From the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology/Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/ Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021; 26(2):e12795. DOI: 10.1111/anec.12795.
4. Chan PH, Wong CK, Pun L, et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of the AliveCor Heart Monitor and Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in a Primary Care Setting. Circulation. 2017; 135(1):110–112. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024439.
5. Using Apple Watch for Arrhythmia Detection. https://www.apple.com/uk/healthcare/docs/site/Apple_Watch_Arrhythmia_Detection.pdf. (December 2020)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献