Access to justice: An evaluation of the informal justice systems

Author:

Ahmad Jawad,Wangenheim Georg VonORCID

Abstract

The judicial system of any state can be divided as formal and informal, where the formal is under the state (official) and informal may or may not be under the domain of the state (informal justice system). Since both systems provide access to justice, however, the informal system is viewed as a threat to formal justice system. In this context we need to better understand the role played by informal justices system. We have focused on three fundamental issues, first to evaluate the role of the alternate and informal justice system to improve access to justice. Second, we listed weaknesses in informal justice systems that gives us an insight into our third goal of suggesting a framework for engaging informal justice system and improved on its shortcomings which can be helpful in supporting or reducing the burden on the formal system. Because of the absence of relevant literature, we resorted to empirical reports and case studies on other developing countries’ to present our arguments. We showed that informal system is playing a positive role in the society and there is a need to reform the system especially for its negative traits, e.g., human rights.

Publisher

IDEA PUBLISHERS

Reference53 articles.

1. Jirga and Dispensation of Social Welfare Services: A Case Study of Mohmand Tribal District, Pakistan

2. Andhini, N. F. (2010). Doing Business 2010 (Doing Business). The World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-0-8213-7961-5

3. Barfield, T. (2006). Informal Dispute Resolution and the Formal Legal System in Contemporary Northern Afghanistan Thomas Barfield.

4. Baras, A. (2004). The mechanics of honor in Pakistan. Asian Human Rights Commission, 3(5), 2.

5. Bhatti, H. (2019, March 6). Mukhtar Mai rape case: SC adjourns review petition after suspects show up without legal counsel. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/1467962

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Actioning the Human Rights Agenda and Issues of Access to Justice;A Research Agenda for a Human Rights Centred Criminology;2024

2. The justice versus amnesty approach to resolving the protracted conflict in the Central African Republic;Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ);2023-06-30

3. Access to Justice: Comparative study of formal and informal dispute resolution mechanisms in district Swat, Pakistan;Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS);2021-10-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3