A Review of Innovation-Based Methods to Jointly Estimate Model and Observation Error Covariance Matrices in Ensemble Data Assimilation

Author:

Tandeo Pierre12,Ailliot Pierre3,Bocquet Marc4,Carrassi Alberto567,Miyoshi Takemasa2,Pulido Manuel895,Zhen Yicun1

Affiliation:

1. a IMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, UMR CNRS 6285, Brest, France

2. b RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe, Japan

3. c LMBA, UMR CNRS 6205, University of Brest, Brest, France

4. d CEREA Joint Laboratory École des Ponts ParisTech and EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, France

5. e Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

6. f National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

7. g Mathematical Institute, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

8. h Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina

9. i CONICET, Corrientes, Argentina

Abstract

AbstractData assimilation combines forecasts from a numerical model with observations. Most of the current data assimilation algorithms consider the model and observation error terms as additive Gaussian noise, specified by their covariance matricesand, respectively. These error covariances, and specifically their respective amplitudes, determine the weights given to the background (i.e., the model forecasts) and to the observations in the solution of data assimilation algorithms (i.e., the analysis). Consequently,andmatrices significantly impact the accuracy of the analysis. This review aims to present and to discuss, with a unified framework, different methods to jointly estimate theandmatrices using ensemble-based data assimilation techniques. Most of the methods developed to date use the innovations, defined as differences between the observations and the projection of the forecasts onto the observation space. These methods are based on two main statistical criteria: 1) the method of moments, in which the theoretical and empirical moments of the innovations are assumed to be equal, and 2) methods that use the likelihood of the observations, themselves contained in the innovations. The reviewed methods assume that innovations are Gaussian random variables, although extension to other distributions is possible for likelihood-based methods. The methods also show some differences in terms of levels of complexity and applicability to high-dimensional systems. The conclusion of the review discusses the key challenges to further develop estimation methods forand. These challenges include taking into account time-varying error covariances, using limited observational coverage, estimating additional deterministic error terms, or accounting for correlated noise.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Horizon 2020

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3