Sensitivity of C-Band Polarimetric Radar–Based Drop Size Estimates to Maximum Diameter

Author:

Carey Lawrence D.1,Petersen Walter A.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

2. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia

Abstract

AbstractEstimating raindrop size has been a long-standing objective of polarimetric radar–based precipitation retrieval methods. The relationship between the differential reflectivity Zdr and the median volume diameter D0 is typically derived empirically using raindrop size distribution observations from a disdrometer, a raindrop physical model, and a radar scattering model. Because disdrometers are known to undersample large raindrops, the maximum drop diameter Dmax is often an assumed parameter in the rain physical model. C-band Zdr is sensitive to resonance scattering at drop diameters larger than 5 mm, which falls in the region of uncertainty for Dmax. Prior studies have not accounted for resonance scattering at C band and Dmax uncertainty in assessing potential errors in drop size retrievals. As such, a series of experiments are conducted that evaluate the effect of Dmax parameterization on the retrieval error of D0 from a fourth-order polynomial function of C-band Zdr by varying the assumed Dmax through the range of assumptions found in the literature. Normalized bias errors for estimating D0 from C-band Zdr range from −8% to 15%, depending on the postulated error in Dmax. The absolute normalized bias error increases with C-band Zdr, can reach 10% for Zdr as low as 1–1.75 dB, and can increase from there to values as large as 15%–45% for larger Zdr, which is a larger potential bias error than is found at S and X band. Uncertainty in Dmax assumptions and the associated potential D0 retrieval errors should be noted and accounted for in future C-band polarimetric radar studies.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3