Affiliation:
1. Philosophy, University of Toronto
Abstract
This paper argues that free speech is a ‘two-way right’. The right to marriage is a typical two-way right: it is not a guarantee that every single person can get married. Instead, it only ensures that if two consenting adults wish to marry each other, they can do so freely. Similarly, the right to free speech does not protect a speaker’s unilateral right to speak, nor an audience’s unilateral right to hear. Free speech protects the parties’ right to communicate with each other. Many agree that communication is a collaborative activity. Yet, this collaborative essence is sometimes overlooked. Particularly, when analyzing speech rights, there is a tendency to zoom in on either the speaker interests or the audience interests, focusing on the distinctions between the two. The two-way approach reorients our understanding of free speech, to one that is more integrally shaped by a concept of communication as a joint collaborative endeavor.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Reference29 articles.
1. Freedom of expression;Bonotti, MatteoJonathan Seglow;Philosophy Compass,2021
2. Silencing speech with pornography;Caponetto, Laura;Phenomenology and Mind,2016
3. Corbin, Caroline Mala. 2009. The First Amendment right against compelled listening. Boston University Law Review, 89: 939–1016. https://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/bulr/volume89n3/documents/CORBIN.pdf.