Emotional based school avoidance: Exploring school staff and pupil perspectives on provision in mainstream schools

Author:

Chian Jeremy,Holliman Andrew,Pinto Cynthia,Waldeck Daniel

Abstract

Aim(s):The present study explored perspectives of school staff, who shared their experiences of facilitators and barriers to mainstream school ‘emotional based school avoidance’ (EBSA) initiatives and practices, and school-aged pupils presenting with EBSA, who described what supported or hindered their school experiences.Method:Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six mainstream school staff and seven school-aged pupils who have engaged in EBSA. Staff interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (RTA), and pupil interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).Findings:Six main themes emerged across the two samples, two of which are presented in the present study: for school staff, ‘Systemic and Unanticipated Barriers’; and for pupils, ‘Pupil’s Sense of Inclusivity’. Findings from school staff suggest that EBSA initiatives and practices are hindered by financial constraints, less cooperative families, and misalignment with external partners, who may function according to different working models. For pupils, the findings suggest their experience is facilitated when they feel included, accepted, have a sense of school belonging, and where there is attention towards their interests, strengths, and achievements.Limitations:This research did not capture parent voices, even though their involvement is a crucial aspect in supporting their children.Conclusions:This study highlights some of the long-standing (systemic) challenges as well as those associated with multi-agency working and working with families, which threaten to impede effective EBSA initiatives and practices. It also highlights the power of inclusivity and positive relationships for pupils, which may function as a protective factor to their school attendance.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference80 articles.

1. When and How to use Multiple Informants to Improve Clinical Assessments;Alexander;Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment,2017

2. School Phobia-Its Classification and Relationship to Dependency;Berg;The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,1969

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology

4. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

5. British Psychological Society (BPS) (2021). BPS Code of Human Research Ethics. The British Psychological Society. https://york.citycollege.eu/files4users/files/BPSCode-of-HumanResearch-Ethics-2021.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3