International Observational Analysis of Evolution and Outcomes of Chronic Stable Angina: The Multinational CLARIFY Study

Author:

Mesnier Jules12,Ducrocq Gregory1234,Danchin Nicolas45,Ferrari Roberto67,Ford Ian8,Tardif Jean-Claude9ORCID,Tendera Michal10ORCID,Fox Kim M.11,Steg Philippe Gabriel123411ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, France (J.M., G.D., P.G.S.).

2. French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials, Paris (J.M., G.D., P.G.S.).

3. Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale U1148, Paris, France (G.D., P.G.S.).

4. Université de Paris, France (G.D., N.D., P.G.S.).

5. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, France (N.D.).

6. Maria Cecilia Hospital, Gruppo Villa Maria Care & Research, Cotignola (Ravenna), Italy (R.F.).

7. Centro Cardiologico Universitario di Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Italy (R.F.).

8. Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow, United Kingdom (I.F.).

9. Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Canada (J.-C.T.).

10. School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Poland (M.T.).

11. Imperial College, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom (K.M.F., P.G.S.).

Abstract

Background: Although angina is common in patients with stable coronary artery disease, limited data are available on its prevalence, natural evolution, and outcomes in the era of effective cardiovascular drugs and widespread use of coronary revascularization. Methods: Using data from 32 691 patients with stable coronary artery disease from the prospective observational CLARIFY registry (Prospective Observational Longitudinal Registry of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease), anginal status was mapped each year in patients without new coronary revascularization or new myocardial infarction. The use of medical interventions in the year preceding angina resolution was explored. The effect of 1-year changes in angina status on 5-year outcomes was analyzed using multivariable analysis. Results: Among 7212 (22.1%) patients who reported angina at baseline, angina disappeared (without coronary revascularization) in 39.6% at 1 year, with further annual decreases. In patients without angina at baseline, 2.0% to 4.8% developed angina each year. During 5-year follow-up, angina was controlled in 7773 patients, in whom resolution of angina was obtained with increased use of antianginal treatment in 11.1%, with coronary revascularization in 4.5%, and without any changes in medication or revascularization in 84.4%. Compared to patients without angina at baseline and 1 year, persistence of angina and occurrence of angina at 1 year with conservative management were each independently associated with higher rates of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.12−1.55] for persistence of angina; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.11−1.70] for occurrence of angina) at 5 years. Patients whose angina had resolved at 1 year with conservative management were not at higher risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction than those who never experienced angina (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.82−1.15]). Conclusions: Angina affects almost one-quarter of patients with stable coronary artery disease but resolves without events or coronary revascularization in most patients. Resolution of angina within 1 year with conservative management predicted outcomes similar to lack of angina, whereas persistence or occurrence was associated with worse outcomes. Because most patients with angina are likely to experience resolution of symptoms, and because there is no demonstrated outcome benefit to routine revascularization, this study emphasizes the value of conservative management of stable coronary artery disease. Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN43070564.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3