A Randomized and Clinical Effectiveness Trial Comparing Two Pharmacogenetic Algorithms and Standard Care for Individualizing Warfarin Dosing (CoumaGen-II)

Author:

Anderson Jeffrey L.1,Horne Benjamin D.1,Stevens Scott M.1,Woller Scott C.1,Samuelson Kent M.1,Mansfield Justin W.1,Robinson Michelle1,Barton Stephanie1,Brunisholz Kim1,Mower Chrissa P.1,Huntinghouse John A.1,Rollo Jeffrey S.1,Siler Dustin1,Bair Tami L.1,Knight Stacey1,Muhlestein Joseph B.1,Carlquist John F.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Intermountain Healthcare (Intermountain Medical Center and LDS and McKay-Dee Hospitals), Murray, UT (J.L.A., B.D.H., S.M.S., S.C.W., K.M.S., J.W.M., M.R., S.B., K.B., C.P.M., J.A.H., J.S.R., D.S., T.L.B., S.K., J.B.M., J.F.C.); and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (J.L.A., B.D.H., S.M.S., S.C.W., K.M.S., S.B., K.B., S.K., J.B.M., J.F.C.).

Abstract

Background— Warfarin is characterized by marked variations in individual dose requirements and a narrow therapeutic window. Pharmacogenetics (PG) could improve dosing efficiency and safety, but clinical trials evidence is meager. Methods and Results— A Randomized and Clinical Effectiveness Trial Comparing Two Pharmacogenetic Algorithms and Standard Care for Individualizing Warfarin Dosing (CoumaGen-II) comprised 2 comparisons: (1) a blinded, randomized comparison of a modified 1-step (PG-1) with a 3-step algorithm (PG-2) (N=504), and (2) a clinical effectiveness comparison of PG guidance with use of either algorithm with standard dosing in a parallel control group (N=1866). A rapid method provided same-day CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotyping. Primary outcomes were percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios at 1 and 3 months and percentage of time in therapeutic range. Primary analysis was modified intention to treat. In the randomized comparison, PG-2 was noninferior but not superior to PG-1 for percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios at 1 month and 3 months and for percentage of time in therapeutic range at 3 months. However, the combined PG cohort was superior to the parallel controls (percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios 31% versus 42% at 1 month; 30% versus 42% at 3 months; percentage of time in therapeutic range 69% versus 58%, 71% versus 59%, respectively, all P <0.001). Differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and clinical indication. There were fewer percentage international normalized ratios ≥4 and ≤1.5 and serious adverse events at 3 months (4.5% versus 9.4% of patients, P <0.001) with PG guidance. Conclusions— These findings suggest that PG dosing should be considered for broader clinical application, a proposal that is being tested further in 3 major randomized trials. The simpler 1-step PG algorithm provided equivalent results and may be preferable for clinical application. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00927862.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Pharmacogenomics: Translating Functional Genomics into Rational Therapeutics

2. Drug Target Pharmacogenomics

3. Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics: Current Status, Future Prospects

4. The pharmacogenetics of coumarin therapy

5. An analysis of the lowest effective intensity of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation;Hylek EM;N Engl J Med,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3