Race and Sex Differences in the Association of Bystander CPR for Cardiac Arrest

Author:

Chan Paul S.12ORCID,Girotra Saket3ORCID,Blewer Audrey4ORCID,Kennedy Kevin F.1,McNally Bryan F.5ORCID,Benoit Justin L.6ORCID,Starks Monique A.47ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (P.S.C., K.F.K.).

2. University of Missouri–Kansas City (P.S.C.).

3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.G.).

4. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (A.B., M.A.S.).

5. Emory University School of Medicine, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (B.F.M).

6. University of Cincinnati, OH (J.L.B.).

7. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.A.S.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with higher survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but whether its association with survival differs by patients’ sex and race and ethnicity is less clear. METHODS: Within a large US registry, we identified 623 342 nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during 2013 to 2022 for this observational cohort study. Using hierarchical logistic regression, we examined whether there was a differential association between bystander CPR and survival outcomes by patients’ sex and race and ethnicity, overall and by neighborhood strata. RESULTS: Mean age was 62.1±17.1 years, and 35.9% were women. Nearly half of patients (49.8%) were non-Hispanic White; 20.6% were non-Hispanic Black; 7.3% were Hispanic; 2.9% were Asian; and 0.4% were Native American. Overall, 58 098 (9.3%) survived to hospital discharge. Although bystander CPR was associated with higher survival in each race and ethnicity group, the association of bystander CPR compared with patients without bystander CPR in each racial and ethnic group was highest in individuals who were White (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.30–1.37]) and Native American (adjusted OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.02–1.90]) and lowest in individuals who were Black (adjusted OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04–1.14]; P interaction <0.001). The adjusted OR for bystander CPR compared with those without bystander CPR for Hispanic patients was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.20–1.139), for Asian patients, it was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.12–1.42), and for those of unknown race, it was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.25–1.36). Similarly, bystander CPR was associated with higher survival in both sexes, but its association with survival was higher in men (adjusted OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.31–1.38]) than women (adjusted OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12–1.19]; P interaction <0.001). The weaker association of bystander CPR in Black individuals and women was consistent across neighborhood race and ethnicity and income strata. Similar results were observed for the outcome of survival without severe neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Although bystander CPR was associated with higher survival in all patients, its association with survival was weakest for Black individuals and women with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3