Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven CT
2. BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MA
4. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation East Hanover NJ
5. Institut de Cardiologie Université de Montréal Montréal Québec Canada
6. University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
7. Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC
8. Baylor Heart and Vascular InstituteBaylor University Medical CenterImperial College Dallas TX USA
9. Imperial College London UK
10. Division of Cardiology University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada
Abstract
Background
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, associated with undertreatment and worse outcomes. New treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction may be particularly important in patients with concomitant COPD.
Methods and Results
We examined outcomes in 8399 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, according to COPD status, in the PARADIGM‐HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker–Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. Cox regression models were used to compare COPD versus non‐COPD subgroups and the effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril. Patients with COPD (n=1080, 12.9%) were older than patients without COPD (mean 67 versus 63 years;
P
<0.001), with similar left ventricular ejection fraction (29.9% versus 29.4%), but higher NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; median, 1741 pg/mL versus 1591 pg/mL; P=0.01), worse functional class (New York Heart Association III/IV 37% versus 23%;
P
<0.001) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Clinical Summary Score (73 versus 81;
P
<0.001), and more congestion and comorbidity. Medical therapy was similar in patients with and without COPD except for beta‐blockade (87% versus 94%;
P
<0.001) and diuretics (85% versus 80%;
P
<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, COPD was associated with higher risks of heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13–1.54), and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05–1.34), but not cardiovascular death (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94–1.30), or all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99–1.31). COPD was also associated with higher risk of all cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05–1.31) and noncardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29–1.64). The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril was consistent in patients with and without COPD for all end points.
Conclusions
In PARADIGM‐HF, COPD was associated with lower use of beta‐blockers and worse health status and was an independent predictor of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospitalization. Sacubitril/valsartan was beneficial in this high‐risk subgroup.
Registration
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT01035255.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine