Patient‐Reported Outcomes and Patient‐Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT‐AF Clinical Trial

Author:

Humphries Brittany1ORCID,Cox Jafna L.234,Parkash Ratika2ORCID,Thabane Lehana1567,Foster Gary A.16,MacKillop James8,Nemis‐White Joanna9,Hamilton Laura10,Ciaccia Antonio11,Choudhri Shurjeel H.12,Xie Feng113ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

2. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada

3. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada

4. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Nova Scotia Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Halifax NS Canada

5. Departments of Anesthesia/Pediatrics McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

6. Biostatistics Unit Centre for Evaluation of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

7. Population Health Research InstituteHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

8. Sydney Primary Care Medical Clinic Sydney NS Canada

9. Strive Health Management Consulting Ltd Halifax NS Canada

10. QEII Health Sciences CentreNova Scotia Health Authority Halifax NS Canada

11. Medical Affairs–Cardiovascular Medicine Bayer Inc Mississauga ON Canada

12. Medical and Scientific Affairs Bayer Inc Mississauga ON Canada

13. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

Abstract

Background The IMPACT‐AF (Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a prospective, randomized, cluster design trial comparing atrial fibrillation management with a computerized clinical decision support system with usual care (control) in the primary care setting of Nova Scotia, Canada. The objective of this analysis was to assess and compare patient‐reported health‐related quality of life and patient‐reported experience with atrial fibrillation care between clinical decision support and control groups. Methods and Results Health‐related quality of life was measured using the EuroQol 5‐dimensional 5‐level scale, whereas patient‐reported experience was assessed using a self‐administered satisfaction questionnaire, both assessed at baseline and 12 months. Health utilities were calculated using the Canadian EuroQol 5‐dimensional 5‐level value set. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations were used to compare between groups. Among 1145 patients enrolled in the trial, 717 had complete EuroQol 5‐dimensional 5‐level data at baseline. The mean age of patients was 73.53 years, and 61.87% were men. Mean utilities at baseline were 0.809 (SD, 0.157) and 0.814 (SD, 0.157) for clinical decision support and control groups, respectively. At baseline, most patients in both groups reported being “very satisfied” with the care received for their atrial fibrillation. There were no statistically significant differences in utility scores or patient satisfaction between groups at 12 months. Conclusions Health‐related quality of life of patients remained stable over 12 months, and there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction or utility scores between clinical decision support and control groups. Registration information clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01927367.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3