High‐Dose Glucagon Has Hemodynamic Effects Regardless of Cardiac Beta‐Adrenoceptor Blockade: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author:

Petersen Kasper M.1ORCID,Bøgevig Søren1,Riis Troels1,Andersson Niklas W.1,Dalhoff Kim P.12,Holst Jens J.34,Knop Filip K.3256,Faber Jens7,Petersen Tonny S.12ORCID,Christensen Mikkel B.125ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Bispebjerg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

3. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

5. Center for Clinical Metabolic Research Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Hellerup Denmark

6. Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen Gentofte Denmark

7. Department of Medicine Herlev HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

Background Intravenous high‐dose glucagon is a recommended antidote against beta‐blocker poisonings, but clinical effects are unclear. We therefore investigated hemodynamic effects and safety of high‐dose glucagon with and without concomitant beta‐blockade. Methods and Results In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy men received combinations of esmolol (1.25 mg/kg bolus+0.75 mg/kg/min infusion), glucagon (50 µg/kg), and identical volumes of saline placebo on 5 separate days in random order (saline+saline; esmolol+saline; esmolol+glucagon bolus; saline+glucagon infusion; saline+glucagon bolus). On individual days, esmolol/saline was infused from −15 to 30 minutes. Glucagon/saline was administered from 0 minutes as a 2‐minute intravenous bolus or as a 30‐minute infusion (same total glucagon dose). End points were hemodynamic and adverse effects of glucagon compared with saline. Compared with saline, glucagon bolus increased mean heart rate by 13.0 beats per minute (95% CI, 8.0–18.0; P <0.001), systolic blood pressure by 15.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 8.0–23.2; P =0.002), diastolic blood pressure by 9.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 6.3–12.6; P <0.001), and cardiac output by 18.0 % (95% CI, 9.7–26.9; P =0.003) at the 5‐minute time point on days without beta‐blockade. Similar effects of glucagon bolus occurred on days with beta‐blockade and between 15 and 30 minutes during infusion. Hemodynamic effects of glucagon thus reflected pharmacologic glucagon plasma concentrations. Glucagon‐induced nausea occurred in 80% of participants despite ondansetron pretreatment. Conclusions High‐dose glucagon boluses had significant hemodynamic effects regardless of beta‐blockade. A glucagon infusion had comparable and apparently longer‐lasting effects compared with bolus, indicating that infusion may be preferable to bolus injections. Registration Information URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03533179.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference31 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3