Abstract WP72: Administration Rates for IV TPA Varies by Type of Stroke Center

Author:

Alberts Mark J1,Williams Scott2,Hampel MJ2,Schmaltz Stephen2,Donini-Lenhoff Alessandra2,Baker David2

Affiliation:

1. UT Southwestern Med Cntr, Dallas, TX

2. The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in endovascular stroke therapy, the use of IV TPA remains the most prevalent acute therapy for ischemic stroke. The earlier that IV thrombolytic therapy is initiated, the better the patient outcome. We analyzed data from different types of hospital stroke centers to determine if differences the rates of IV TPA administration exist. Our hypothesis was that IV TPA would be administered more consistently at Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs) than Primary Stroke Centers (PSCs) and non-center certified facilities (NC). Methods: We examined data submitted to the Joint Commission for STK-4 (acute ischemic stroke, arrival within 2 hours and IV TPA administered within 3 hours) from Q4 2013 through Q3 2014. Measure rates were analyzed for the three certification groups (CSC, PSC and NC) to see if there were any significant differences in performance using logistic mixed effects models . Drip and ship patients were excluded from the analysis. Results: We had patient-level data from 54 CSCs, 989 PSCs, and 334 NC facilities. The average annual number of ischemic stroke admissions at each were: 367 for CSCs, 169 for PSCs, and 73 for NCs. The average annual number of patients treated with IV TPA was 23.6 at CSCs, 14.9 at PSCs, and 6.2 at NCs. The rates of IV TPA administration to eligible patients was 91% at CSCs, 85% at PSCs, and 52% at NCs. CSCs had statistically significantly higher rates of IV TPA administration compared to PSCs (p < 0.001), and PSCs had higher rates compared to NCs (p < 0.001). We did not collect data about IV TPA use out to 4.5 hours after stroke onset. Conclusions: Patients admitted to a certified stroke center are more likely to receive IV TPA than at non-certified facilities. CSCs administer IV TPA to a higher percentage of patients than either PSCs or NC facilities. While not every hospital can become a CSC, perhaps educational efforts and care paradigms at CSCs can be emulated at other facilities to increase the use of IV TPA in appropriate patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3