Are There Inequalities in the Provision of Stroke Care?

Author:

McKevitt Christopher1,Coshall Catherine1,Tilling Kate1,Wolfe Charles1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Public Health Sciences (C.M., C.C., C.W.), King’s College London; and the Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol (K.T.), United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— There is evidence of unequal access to health care interventions even where universal health systems operate. We investigated associations between patients’ sociodemographic characteristics and the provision of acute and longer-term stroke care in a multiethnic urban population. Methods— We used data from 1635 patients with first-ever stroke, collected by a population-based stroke register from 1995 to 2000. Using multivariable analyses, controlled for sociodemographic and clinical factors, we investigated access to 22 evidence-based components of care. Results— 1392 patients (85.1%) were admitted to hospital; of these, 354 (25.4%) were admitted or transferred to a stroke unit. Of those with clinical need, 607 (70.7%) received physical therapies; 477 (59.8%) received speech and language therapy. Older age was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.77, P =0.02) and diagnostic brain imaging (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.30, P <0.01) but higher odds of receiving physical therapy (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.22 to 14.73, P <0.01). Black ethnicity was associated with higher odds of stroke unit admission (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.49, P <0.04). There was a weak association between socioeconomic status and admission to hospital and stroke unit. Gender was associated only with treatment of hypertension before stroke. Conclusions— Provision of individual components of care over 1 year varied for specific sociodemographic categories, but there was no consistent pattern of inequality. Clinical decision-making processes are likely to influence these patterns. Further information about clinician and patient roles in decision making is required.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3