Association of High‐Deductible Health Plans With Health Care Use and Costs for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Author:

Gupta Ravi123ORCID,Yang Lin45ORCID,Lewey Jennifer456ORCID,Navathe Amol S.4789,Groeneveld Peter W.4578ORCID,Khatana Sameed Ahmed M.4568ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD

2. Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD

3. Hopkins Business of Health Initiative, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD

4. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA

5. Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA

6. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA

7. Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PA Philadelphia

8. Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center PA Philadelphia

9. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA

Abstract

Background By increasing cost sharing, high‐deductible health plans (HDHPs) aim to reduce low‐value health care use. The association of HDHPs with health care use and costs in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease is unknown. Methods and Results This longitudinal cohort study analyzed 57 690 privately insured patients, aged 18 to 64 years, from a large commercial claims database with chronic cardiovascular disease from 2011 to 2019. Health care entities in which all or most beneficiaries switched from being in a traditional plan to an HDHP were identified. A difference‐in‐differences design was used to account for differences between individuals who remained in traditional plans and those who switched to HDHPs and to assess changes in health care use and costs. Among the 934 individuals in the HDHP group and the 56 756 in the traditional plan group, switching to an HDHP was not associated with statistically significant changes in annual outpatient visits, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits (−8.3% [95% CI, −16.8 to 1.1], −28.5% [95% CI, −62.1 to 34.6], and 11.2% [95% CI, −20.9 to 56.5], respectively). Switching to an HDHP was associated with an increase of $921 (95% CI, $743–$1099) in out‐of‐pocket costs but no statistically significant difference in total health care costs. Conclusions Among commercially insured patients with chronic cardiovascular disease, switching to an HDHP was not associated with a change in health care use but was associated with an increase in out‐of‐pocket costs. Although health care use by individuals with chronic cardiovascular disease may not be sensitive to higher cost sharing associated with HDHP enrollment, there may be a significant increase in patients' financial burden.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3