Presence of Residual Cardiac Thrombus Predicts Poor Outcome in Cardioembolic Stroke After Reperfusion Therapy

Author:

Zhang Tingxia1,Zhou Huan1,Yang Jiansheng1,Zhou Ying1,Chen Yi1ORCID,He Yaode1ORCID,Xue Rui1ORCID,Chen Zhicai1ORCID,Lou Min1ORCID,Yan Shenqiang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine Hangzhou China

Abstract

Background In patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism, a residual thrombus may still be present in the cardiac cavity even after reperfusion therapy. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of a residual cardiac thrombus in cardioembolic stroke after reperfusion therapy and analyze its impact on clinical outcome. Methods and Results We enrolled patients with cardioembolic stroke from our prospectively collected database who underwent 2‐phase cardiac computed tomography within 7 days after reperfusion therapy. Residual cardiac thrombus was defined as a filling defect on both early‐ and late‐phase images, whereas circulatory stasis was defined as a filling defect only on the early‐phase images in the left atrial appendage. The primary outcome was a poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 3–6) at 90 days. The secondary outcome was a composite end point event (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke) at 90 days. A total of 303 patients were included, of whom 94 (31.0%) had a residual cardiac thrombus. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of a residual cardiac thrombus was associated with a poor clinical outcome (odds ratio, 1.951 [95% CI, 1.027–3.707]; P =0.041) but not circulatory stasis in the left atrial appendage (odds ratio, 1.096 [95% CI, 0.542–2.217]; P =0.798). Furthermore, there was no correlation between a residual cardiac thrombus and the composite end point event (30.0% versus 31.1%; P =1.000). Conclusions Residual cardiac thrombus occurs in approximately one‐third of patients with cardioembolic stroke after reperfusion therapy and is often indicative of a poor clinical outcome.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3