Affiliation:
1. Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School 375 Longwood Avenue, 4th Floor Boston MA USA
2. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA
3. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL USA
4. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark NJ USA
5. Jewish General Hospital McGill University Montreal Canada
Abstract
Background
Normalization of echocardiographic chamber measurements for body surface area may result in misclassification of individuals with obesity or sarcopenia. Normalization for alternative measures of body size may be preferable, but there remains a dearth of information on their normative values and association with cardiovascular function metrics.
Methods and Results
A total of 3032 individuals underwent comprehensive 2‐dimensional echocardiography at Exam 6 in MESA (Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). In the subgroup of 608 individuals free of cardiopulmonary disease (69.5±7.0 years, 46% male, 48% White, 17% Chinese, 15% Black, 21% Hispanic), normative values were derived for left and right cardiac chamber measurements across a variety of ratiometric (body surface area, body mass index, height) and allometric (height
1.6
, height
2.7
) scaling parameters. Normative upper and lower reference values were provided for each scaling parameter stratified across age groups, sex, and race or ethnicity. Among scaling parameters, body surface area and height were associated with the least variability across race and ethnicity categories and height
2.7
was associated with the least variability across sex categories.
Conclusions
In this diverse cohort of community‐dwelling older adults, we provide normative values for common echocardiographic parameters across a variety of indexation methods.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)