Causal Association Between Anemia and Cardiovascular Disease: A 2‐Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

Author:

Gan Ting123,Hu Jing4,Liu Wenhu123,Li Cui123,Xu Qian123,Wang Ya123,Lu Shuai5,Aledan Anwer Khalid Okab123,Wang Yan123,Wang Zhaohui123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

3. Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Immunological Diagnosis and Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

5. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

Abstract

Background Although previous observational studies have shown an association between anemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the underlying causal relationship between anemia and CVD remains uncertain. Methods and Results We conducted a 2‐sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study to assess the causal association between anemia and CVD. We extracted summary statistics data for anemia, heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, any stroke, and any ischemic stroke (AIS) from relevant published genome‐wide association studies. After rigorous quality control steps, independent single‐nucleotide polymorphisms for each disease were selected as instrumental variables. Inverse‐variance weighting was used as the primary method to estimate the causal association between anemia and CVD in the 2‐sample MR analysis. Simultaneously, we performed a series of multiple methods analyses (median weighting, maximum likelihood [MR robust adjusted profile score]), sensitivity analyses (Cochran's Q test and MR‐Egger intercept, leave‐one‐out test [MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier]), instrumental variable strength evaluations ( F statistic), and statistic power estimates to verify the robustness and reliability of our results. Furthermore, the associations between anemia and CVD from different studies, including the UK Biobank and FinnGen studies, were combined by meta‐analysis. The MR analysis showed that genetically predicted anemia was significantly associated with HF risk at the Bonferroni‐corrected significance level (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04–1.18]; P =0.002) and was suggestively associated with CAD risk (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02–1.22]; P =0.020). However, the associations between anemia and atrial fibrillation, any stroke, or AIS were not statistically significant. In the reverse MR analysis, we found that genetic susceptibility to HF, CAD, and AIS was significantly associated with anemia risk. The ORs of HF, CAD, and AIS were 1.64 (95% CI, 1.39–1.94; P =7.60E‐09), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08–1.24; P =2.32E‐05), and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.11–1.52; P =0.001), respectively. Genetically predicted atrial fibrillation was suggestively associated with anemia (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01–1.12]; P =0.015). Sensitivity analyses found weak evidence of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity, which ensured the robustness and reliability of the results. Meta‐analysis also showed the statistically significant association between anemia and HF risk. Conclusions Our study supports bidirectional causality between anemia and HF and significant associations between genetic predisposition to CAD and AIS with anemia, which contributes to the clinical management of both diseases.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3