Optimum Baseline Clinical Severity Scale Cut Points for Prognosticating Intracerebral Hemorrhage: INTERACT Studies

Author:

You Shoujiang1ORCID,Zheng Danni2,Yoshimura Sohei3ORCID,Ouyang Menglu24ORCID,Han Qiao5,Wang Xia2ORCID,Cao Yongjun1ORCID,Delcourt Candice26ORCID,Song Lili24ORCID,Arima Hisatomi7ORCID,Chen Xiaoying2ORCID,Liu Chun-Feng1ORCID,Lindley Richard I.28ORCID,Robinson Thompson9ORCID,Anderson Craig S.2410ORCID,Chalmers John2ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology and Clinical Research Center of Neurological Disease, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China (S. You, Y.C., C.-F.L.).

2. The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia (D.Z., M.O., X.W., C.D., L.S., X.C., R.I.L., C.S.A., J.C.).

3. Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan (S. Yoshimura).

4. The George Institute for Global Health China, Beijing, China (M.O., L.S., C.S.A.).

5. Department of Neurology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, China (Q.H.).

6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia (C.D.).

7. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Fukuoka University, Japan (H.A.).

8. Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia (R.I.L.).

9. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, United Kingdom (T.R.).

10. Neurology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia (C.S.A.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal cut point of baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Glasgow Coma Scale scores for prognosticating acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. METHODS: Secondary analyses of participant data are from the INTERACT (Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trials) 1 and 2 studies. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to compare the predictive performance of baseline NIHSS and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, ICH score, and max-ICH score. Optimal cut points for predicting 90-day clinical outcomes (death or major disability [defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3–6], major disability [defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3–5], and death alone) were determined using the Youden index. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, hematoma volume, and other known risk factors for poor prognosis. We validated our findings in the INTERACT1 database. RESULTS: There were 2829 INTERACT2 patients (age, 63.5±12.9 years; male, 62.9%; ICH volume, 10.96 [5.77–19.49] mL) included in the main analyses. The baseline NIHSS score (area under the curve, 0.796) had better prognostic utility for predicting death or major disability than the Glasgow Coma Scale score (area under the curve, 0.650) and ICH score (area under the curve, 0.674) and was comparable to max-ICH score (area under the curve, 0.789). Similar findings were observed when assessing the outcome of major disability. A cut point of 10 on baseline NIHSS optimally (sensitivity, 77.5%; specificity, 69.2%) predicted death or major disability (adjusted odds ratio, 4.50 [95% CI, 3.60–5.63]). The baseline NIHSS cut points that optimally predicted major disability and death alone were 10 and 12, respectively. The predictive effect of NIHSS≥10 for poor functional outcomes was consistent in all subgroups including age and baseline hematoma volume. Results were consistent when analyzed in the independent INTERACT1 validation database. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate ICH, a baseline NIHSS score of ≥10 was optimal for predicting poor outcomes at 90 days. Prediction based on baseline NIHSS is better than baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT00226096 and NCT00716079.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3