The relevance of detecting carotid artery calcification on plain radiograph.

Author:

Doris I1,Dobranowski J1,Franchetto A A1,Jaeschke R1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Hamilton General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the potential value of carotid artery calcification observed on plain radiographs in patients referred for carotid angiogram in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. One hundred sixty consecutive patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis underwent both plain radiographs of the carotid arteries and digital subtraction angiography of the same vessels. In addition, 108 of these patients also had duplex ultrasound of the same vascular area. The clinical usefulness of the carotid artery calcification was assessed by calculating the likelihood ratios for different test results against results of angiography and duplex ultrasound. There is a statistically significant association between the degrees of calcification and carotid disease as demonstrated by angiography (P = .0001), although positive correlations of the degrees of stenosis and calcification was only fair (Spearman correlation coefficient r = .4). The sensitivity of carotid calcification in detecting clinically significant stenosis assuming any calcification is abnormal was 89% with a specificity of 46%. The likelihood ratios for 50% stenosis by angiography varied from 0.24 (no calcification) to 3.41 (level III) and for 50% stenosis by duplex ultrasound varied from 0.21 (no calcification) to more than 5.87 (level III). Assessments of the degree of calcification based on plain radiographs had excellent reproducibility (all intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than .9). In this population with a high prevalence of carotid artery disease, there is an association between the presence of carotid calcification and atheromatous disease. If subsequent studies were to show this to apply in the general population, this could be of value in identifying asymptomatic patients at increased risk.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3