Optical Coherence Tomography–Based Functional Stenosis Assessment: FUSION—A Prospective Multicenter Trial

Author:

Jeremias Allen12ORCID,Maehara Akiko23ORCID,Matsumura Mitsuaki2ORCID,Shlofmitz Richard A.1,Maksoud Aziz4,Akasaka Takashi5ORCID,Bezerra Hiram G.6ORCID,Fearon William F.7ORCID,Samady Habib8ORCID,Samuels Bruce9,Rapkin Joshua10,Gopinath Ajay10,Teraphongphom Nutte Tarn10ORCID,Buccola Jana10,Ali Ziad A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center, Roslyn, NY (A.J., R.A.S., Z.A.A.).

2. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.J., A.M., M.M., Z.A.A.).

3. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (A.M.).

4. Cardiovascular Research Institute of Kansas, Wichita (A.M.).

5. Wakayama Medical University, Japan (T.A.).

6. Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida, Tampa (H.G.B.).

7. Stanford University Medical Center, CA (W.F.F.).

8. Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville (H.S.).

9. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (B.S.).

10. Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA (J.R., A.G., N.T.T., J.B.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravascular imaging and intracoronary physiology may both be used to guide and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention; however, they are rarely used together. The virtual flow reserve (VFR) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT)–based model of fractional flow reserve (FFR) facilitating the assessment of the physiological significance of coronary lesions. We aimed to validate the VFR assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenoses. METHODS: FUSION (Validation of OCT-Based Functional Diagnosis of Coronary Stenosis) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study comparing OCT-derived VFR to invasive FFR. VFR was mathematically derived from a lumped parameter flow model based on 3-dimensional lumen morphology. Patients undergoing coronary angiography with intermediate angiographic stenosis (40%–90%) requiring physiological assessment were enrolled. Investigational sites were blinded to the VFR analysis, and all OCT and FFR data were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. The coprimary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of VFR against FFR as the reference standard, each of which was tested against prespecified performance goals. RESULTS: After core laboratory review, 266 vessels in 224 patients from 25 US centers were included in the analysis. The mean angiographic diameter stenosis was 65.5%±14.9%, and the mean FFR was 0.83±0.11. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of VFR versus FFR using a binary cutoff point of 0.80 were 82.0%, 80.4%, and 82.9%, respectively. The 97.5% lower confidence bound met the prespecified performance goal for sensitivity (71.6% versus 70%; P =0.01) and specificity (76.6% versus 75%; P =0.01). The area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84–0.92; P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: OCT-derived VFR demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for predicting invasive FFR. Integrating high-resolution intravascular imaging with imaging-derived physiology may provide synergistic benefits as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04356027.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3