Predictors of Clinical Success After Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicenter Registry

Author:

Hascoët Sébastien1ORCID,Smolka Grzegorz2,Blanchard David1ORCID,Kloëckner Martin1,Brochet Eric3,Bouisset Frederic4,Leurent Guillaume5ORCID,Thambo Jean-Benoit6,Combes Nicolas7ORCID,Dumonteil Nicolas7,Bauer Fabrice8,Nejjari Mohammed9ORCID,Pillière Rémy10,Dauphin Claire11,Bonnet Guillaume12ORCID,Ciobotaru Vlad13,Kételers Régis14ORCID,Gallet Romain15,Hammoudi Nadjib16ORCID,Mangin Lionel17,Bouvaist Hélène18,Spaulding Christian19,Aminian Adel20ORCID,Kilic Teoman21ORCID,Popovic Batric22,Armero Sébastien23,Champagnac Didier24,Gérardin Benoît1

Affiliation:

1. Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, France (S.H., D.B., M.K., B.G.).

2. Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland (G.S.).

3. Hôpital Bichat AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat-Paris, Paris, France (E.B.).

4. Department of Cardiology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, UMR 1295 INSERM, Hôpital Rangueil, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France (F.B.).

5. Department of cardiology, Université Rennes, Inserm, LTSI – UMR1099, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France (G.L.).

6. CHU Haut Lévêque-Bordeaux, Pessac, France (J.-B.T.).

7. Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France (N.C., N.D.).

8. Hôpital Charles Nicolle, CHU Rouen, France (F.B.).

9. Centre Cardiologique du Nord, France (M.N.).

10. Clinique Ambroise Paré-25-27 boulevard Victor Hugo, France (R.P.).

11. Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France (C.D.).

12. CHU Timone, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, France (G.B.).

13. Hôpital privé les Franciscaines, Nîmes, France (V.C.).

14. Hôpital privé le bois, Lille, France (R.K.).

15. Hôpital Henri Mondor AP-HP, Créteil, France (R.G.).

16. Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMR_S 1166, and Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière AP-HP, Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris, France (N.H.).

17. Hôpital d’Annecy, 1 avenue de l’Hôpital, France (L.M.).

18. CHU Grenoble, avenue du Maquis du Grésivaudan, France (H.B.).

19. Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (AP-HP), Paris, France (C.S.).

20. CHU Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium (A.A.).

21. Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Cardiology Department, Umuttepe, Yerteskesi, Kocaeli, Turkey (T.K.).

22. Lorraine University, CHRU Nancy, Cardiology department, Nancy, France (B.P.).

23. Hôpital Européen Marseille, France (S.A.).

24. Médipôle Lyon Villeurbanne, France (D.C.).

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter closure of a symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular leak (PVL) is feasible, but there is presently no conclusive evidence to show consistent efficacy. We aimed to identify predictors of clinical success after transcatheter PVL closure. Methods: Consecutive patients referred to 24 European centers for transcatheter PVL closure in 2017 to 2019 were included in a prospective registry ( Fermeture de Fuite ParaProthétique , FFPP). Clinical success was absence of any of the following within 1 month: re-admission for heart failure, blood transfusion, open-heart valvular surgery, and death. Results: We included 216 symptomatic patients, who underwent 238 percutaneous PVL closure procedures on the mitral (64.3%), aortic (34.0%), or tricuspid (1.7%) valve. Symptoms were heart failure, hemolytic anemia, or both in 48.9%, 7.8%, and 43.3% of patients, respectively. One, 2, and 3 leaks were treated during the same procedure in 69.6%, 26.6%, and 3.8% of patients, respectively. The PVL was pinpoint or involved 1/8 or 1/4 of the valve circumference in 18.6%, 52.4%, and 28.1% of cases, respectively. The most frequently used devices were the Vascular Plug 3, Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder, Vascular Plug 2, and Paravalvular Leak Device (45.0%, 16.6%, 14.2%, and 13.6% of cases, respectively). Successful device(s) implantation with leak reduction to ≤grade 2 was obtained in 85.0% of mitral and 91.4% of aortic procedures, respectively ( P =0.164); with major periprocedural adverse event rates of 3.3% and 1.2%, respectively ( P =0.371); and clinical success rates of 70.3% and 88.0%, respectively ( P =0.004). By multivariate analysis, technical failure, mechanical valve, and hemolytic anemia were independently associated with absence of clinical success (odds ratios [95% CIs], 7.7 [2.0–25.0]; P= 0.002; 3.6 [1.1–11.1]; P =0.036; and 3.7 [1.2–11.9]; P =0.025; respectively). Conclusions: Transcatheter PVL closure is efficient and safe in symptomatic patients but is associated with a lower clinical success rate in patients with hemolysis and/or a mechanical valve. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT05089136

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3