Outcomes With Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization of Coronary Lesions With Gray-Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values

Author:

Megaly Michael12,Khalil Charl3,Saad Marwan45,Xenogiannis Iosif1,Omer Mohamed12,Anantha Narayanan Mahesh6,Pershad Ashish7,Garcia Santiago1,Seto Arnold H.8,Burke M. Nicholas1,Brilakis Emmanouil S.1

Affiliation:

1. Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, MN (M.M., I.X., M.O., S.G., M.N.B., E.S.B.).

2. Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN (M.M., M.O.).

3. Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, NY (C.K.).

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI (M.S.).

5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (M.S.).

6. Division of Vascular Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, CT (M.A.N.).

7. Division of Cardiology, Banner University Medical Center and University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (A.P.).

8. Division of Cardiology, Long Beach VA Medical Center, Orange, CA (A.H.S.).

Abstract

Background: Management of coronary lesions with fractional flow reserve values in the gray zone (0.75–0.80) remains controversial due to conflicting data on the performance versus deferral of revascularization. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 observational studies including 2683 patients that compared the outcomes of deferred versus performed revascularization of coronary lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve values. Results: During a mean follow-up of 31±9 months, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (12.54 % versus 11.25%; odds ratio [OR], 1.64 [95% CI, 0.78–3.44]; P =0.19, I2=84%), cardiac mortality (1.25% versus 0.72%; OR, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.58–5.46]; P =0.31, I2=18%), and myocardial infarction (1.28% versus 2.66%; OR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.22–2.79]; P =0.71, I2=65%) was similar with deferral versus performance of revascularization in coronary lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve. Deferral of revascularization was associated with a higher incidence of target vessel revascularization (9.12% versus 5.78%; OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.03–3.33]; P =0.04, I2=62%). When the analysis was limited only to studies that used percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization, deferred revascularization remained associated with a higher risk of target vessel revascularization (18% versus 7.3%; OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.53–6.02]; P <0.001) and was associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (23.2% versus 13.4%; OR, 3.38 [95% CI, 1.92–5.95]; P <0.001). Conclusions: In lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve, revascularization was associated with a similar incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event but a lower incidence of target vessel revascularization over a mean follow-up of approximately 2.5 years. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ . Unique identifier: CRD42019128076.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3