Patient–Provider Communication and Health Outcomes Among Individuals With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States

Author:

Okunrintemi Victor1,Spatz Erica S.1,Di Capua Paul1,Salami Joseph A.1,Valero-Elizondo Javier1,Warraich Haider1,Virani Salim S.1,Blaha Michael J.1,Blankstein Ron1,Butt Adeel A.1,Borden William B.1,Dharmarajan Kumar1,Ting Henry1,Krumholz Harlan M.1,Nasir Khurram1

Affiliation:

1. From the Center for Healthcare Advancement and Outcomes (V.O., J.A.S., J.V.-E., K.N.) and Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute (K.N.), Baptist Health South Florida, Miami; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (E.S.S., K.D., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (E.S.S.); Department of Internal Medicine, Baptist Health Medical Group, Miami, FL (P.D.C.); Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public...

Abstract

Background— Consumer-reported patient–provider communication (PPC) assessed by Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey in ambulatory settings is incorporated as a complementary value metric for patient-centered care of chronic conditions in pay-for-performance programs. In this study, we examine the relationship of PPC with select indicators of patient-centered care in a nationally representative US adult population with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results— The study population consisted of a nationally representative sample of 6810 individuals (aged ≥18 years), representing 18.3 million adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (self-reported or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition diagnosis) reporting a usual source of care in the 2010 to 2013 pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey cohort. Participants responded to questions from Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey that assessed PPC, and we developed a weighted PPC composite score using their responses, categorized as 1 (poor), 2 (average), and 3 (optimal). Outcomes of interest were (1) patient-reported outcomes: 12-item Short Form physical/mental health status, (2) quality of care measures: statin and ASA use, (3) healthcare resource utilization: emergency room visits and hospital stays, and (4) total annual and out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease patients reporting poor versus optimal were over 2-fold more likely to report poor outcomes; 52% and 26% more likely to report that they are not on statin and aspirin, respectively, had a significantly greater utilization of health resources (odds ratio≥2 emergency room visit, 1.41 [95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.81]; odds ratio≥2 hospitalization, 1.36 [95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.79]), as well as an estimated $1243 ($127–$2359) higher annual healthcare expenditure. Conclusions— This study reveals a strong relationship between PPC and patient-reported outcomes, utilization of evidence-based therapies, healthcare resource utilization, and expenditures among those with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Examining the Role of Patient Experience Surveys in Measuring Health Care Quality

2. World Health Organization. The Top 10 Leading Causes of Death. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed January 22 2017.

3. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Attachment to the Annual Report to Congress: National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care: Agency-Specific Quality Strategic Plans. http://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/nqs/nqsplans.pdf. Accessed January 25 2017.

4. Is Patient Activation Associated With Future Health Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients With Diabetes?

5. Informed Patient Choice: Patient-Centered Valuing Of Surgical Risks And Benefits

Cited by 61 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3