Stent‐Assisted Coiling Versus Balloon‐Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide‐Necked Aneurysms: A 2‐Center Experience

Author:

Vivanco‐Suarez Juan1,Wallace Adam N.2,Dandapat Sudeepta3,Lopez Gloria V.1,Mendez‐Ruiz Aldo1,Kayan Yasha4,Copelan Alexander Z.4,Dajles Andres1,Zevallos Cynthia B.1,Quispe‐Orozco Darko1,Mendez‐Ruiz Alan1,Galecio‐Castillo Milagros1,Samaniego Edgar A.1,Farooqui Mudassir1,Delgado Josser E.4,Ortega‐Gutierrez Santiago15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City IA

2. Department of Neurointerventional Surgery Ascension Columbia St. Mary's Hospital Milwaukee WI

3. Department of Neurosciences Aurora Neuroscience Innovation Institute St. Luke's Hospital Milwaukee WI

4. Neurointerventional Radiology Abbott Northwestern Hospital Minneapolis MN

5. Department of Radiology and Neurosurgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City IA

Abstract

Background Balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and stent‐assisted coiling (SAC) have been established as feasible approaches to manage ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Antiplatelet medications used with SAC theoretically increase risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of SAC versus BAC for acutely ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods We performed a 2‐center retrospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with SAC or BAC for ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms from 2015 to 2020. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and aneurysm characteristics were collected. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were radiographic aneurysm occlusion at follow‐up and functional status at 3 months. Safety outcomes included periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemic complications and symptomatic ventriculostomy tract and cerebrospinal shunt hemorrhage rates. Univariable and multivariable analyses with multiple imputations to account for follow‐up loss were performed. Results A total of 112 and 109 patients underwent SAC and BAC, respectively. Median cohort age was 56 years, and 72% were female. Baseline characteristics were similar. Hydrocephalus rate was higher in the SAC group (78% versus 64%; P =0.02). Median aneurysm size was 5.1 mm. Anterior circulation aneurysms were most common (81%). Aneurysm and neck size were different, more aneurysms measuring <7 mm (80% versus 67%; P =0.02) and larger neck size aneurysms (3.7 versus 3.2 mm; P =0.02) were treated with SAC. At first follow‐up, SAC showed higher rates of complete occlusion (61% versus 45%; P =0.02) before and after adjusting for confounders. Functional outcome was not different in the multivariable models after adjustment. Coil herniation was higher in the BAC group (8% versus 2%; P =0.03). Thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, and ventriculostomy complications were not different. The use of acute antithrombotic therapy was not associated with symptomatic ventriculostomy tract hemorrhage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that SAC may be as safe as BAC for the acute management of ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms without significant risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3