Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion

Author:

Flores Alan1ORCID,Elizalde Marcos2,Seró Laia1,Ustrell Xavier1,Avivar Ylenia2,Pellisé Anna1,Rodriguez Paula1,Monterde Angela1,Lara Lidia1,Gonzalez‐de‐Echavarri Jose Maria1,Cuba Victor3,Gisbert Marc Rodrigo4,Requena Manuel4,Molina Carlos A.4,Chamorro Angel5,Perez de la Ossa Natalia6,Cardona Pedro7,Cánovas David8,Purroy Francisco9,Silva Yolanda10,Camzpello Ana11,Marti‐Fabregas Joan12,Abilleira Sonia13,Ribó Marc4,

Affiliation:

1. Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII Universitat Rovira I Virgili Spain Tarragona

2. Bioinformatic Department Institut de Investigación Sanitaria Pere Virgili Tarragona Spain

3. Neurointerventional Department Hospital Joan XXIII Tarragona Spain

4. Department of Neurology Hospital Vall d'Hebron Departament de Medicina Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

5. Stroke Unit Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain

6. Stroke Unit Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Barcelona Spain

7. Stroke Unit Hospital Universitari Bellvitge L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Spain

8. Stroke Unit Hospital Parc Tauli Sabadell Spain

9. Stroke Unit Department of Neurology Hospital Arnau de Vilanova Lleida Spain

10. Stroke Unit Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta Girona Spain

11. Department of Neurology Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain

12. Department of Neurology Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau Barcelona Spain

13. Stroke Program Catalan Health Department Agency for Health Quality and Assesment of Catalonia (AQuAS) CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Barcelona Spain

Abstract

Background Among patients with stroke eligible for endovascular treatment, preprocedure identification of those with low chances of successful recanalization with conventional devices (stent‐retrievers and/or direct aspiration) may allow anticipating procedural rescue strategies. We aimed to develop a preprocedural algorithm able to predict recanalization failure with conventional devices (RFCD). Methods Observational study. Data from consecutive patients with stroke who received endovascular treatment between 2019 and 2022 in 10 centers were collected from the Catalan Stroke Registry (Codi Ictus Catalunya Registry, CICAT). RFCD was defined as final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≤2a or the use of rescue therapy defined as balloon angioplasty±stent deployment. Univariate and multivariate analysis to identify variables associated with RFCD were performed. A gradient boosted decision tree machine learning model to predict RFCD was developed utilizing preprocedure variables previously selected. Clinical improvement at 24 hours was defined as a drop of ≥4 points from baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score or 0–1 at 24 hours. Results In total, 984 patients were included; RFCD was observed in 14.3% (n:141) of the cases. Of these, 47.5% (n = 67) received balloon angioplasty±stent deployment as rescue therapy. Among patients receiving balloon angioplasty±stent deployment, clinical improvement was associated with lower number of attempts with conventional devices (median number of passes 2 versus 3; P = 0.045). In logistic regression, the absence of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.730, 95%CI: 1.541–4.836; P = 0.007) and no‐thrombolytic treatment (OR: 1.826, 95%CI: 1.230–2.711; P = 0.003) emerged as independent predictors of RFCD. A predictive model for RFCD, based on age, sex, hypertension, wake‐up stroke, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score, occlusion site, thrombolysis, and atrial fibrillation showed an acceptable discrimination (area under the curve: 0.72±0.024 SD) and accuracy (0.75±0.015 SD). Overall performance was moderate (weighted F1‐score: 0.77±0.041 SD). Conclusion In RFCD patients, early balloon angioplasty±stent deployment rescue was associated with improved outcomes. A predictive model using affordable preprocedure clinical variables could be useful to identify these patients before intervention.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3